Back
ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, ROBIN PHUKAN
Parimal Rajbongshi S/o Late Naren Rajbongshi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. B.C. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. L. Devi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1; Mr. A.I. Ali, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2; Mr. G. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3, 4 and 6 and Ms. K. Phukan, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5.
2. The petitioner, Parimal Rajbongshi had been referred to the Foreigners Tribunal No. 4, Goalpara for rendering an opinion of the Memo no. GLP/B/FT/2010/6008 dated 28.10.2010 of Superintendent of Police (B) Goalpara, as to whether he is a person who entered the State of Assam from the specified territory between the years 1966-1971. Before the tribunal, the petitioner relied upon the Voters’ List of 1959 of village Santoshpur, P.S. Uttar Salmara of Goalpara district which contains the name of Ramesh Chandra Das son of Late Ruhi Das at serial no. 509 and that of Bela Sundari wife of Ramesh at serial no. 510 both bearing house no. 154. The petitioner also relied upon the Voters’ List of 1971 of village Paschim Moinbori, P.S. Baghbor district Kamrup which contains the name of Naren Rajbonshi son of Ramesh at serial no. 682. The petitioner thereafter relied upon the Voters’ List of 19
The burden of proof rests on the claimant to provide consistent documentary evidence. When significant discrepancies exist in age, identity, and genealogical links across historical records, such evi....
The court established that proper procedural safeguards must be followed in citizenship determinations, emphasizing the necessity for thorough investigation and consideration of evidence by authoriti....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
