THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MALASRI NANDI, J.
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Tejinder Singh S/o Shri Inderjeet Singh – Respondent
Crl.Pet. 1031 of 2022
Decided on : 02-03-2023
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482, 451, 452, 457 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 2, 36-C, 60(3), 63, 51 - Vehicle was seized - Custody of vehicle - Petitioner has filed an application whereby learned Sessions Judge has allowed zimma of TATA truck to owner of vehicle which was seized – Held, Petitioner has not produced any procedure prescribed by Central Government as directed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. Mohanlal and another (supra) regarding confiscation proceeding of vehicle - Perusal of Section 36-C and 51 of NDPS Act indicates that provisions of Cr.P.C., so far as, they are not in contradictions with special Act i.e. NDPS Act, shall be applicable to NDPS Act and as in NDPS Act, no procedure for interim custody of vehicle is prescribed, Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. specifically deal with custody and disposal of property pending trial and procedure to be followed by police upon seizure of property - Court is of view that law laid down by Apex Court in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai (supra) will apply to vehicle seized under NDPS Act as well - Thus, Magistrate/Special Judge, NDPS Act shall have power to consider application for interim custody of conveyance/vehicle under provision of Section 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C - Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned Standing Counsel for the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence. Also heard Mr. N. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The petitioner has filed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., 1973, against the order dated 13.06.2022 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kamrup(M), Guwahati in Misc. Case No. 67/2022, whereby the learned Sessions Judge has allowed the zimma of TATA truck bearing Regd. No. JK-02-BL-8199 to the owner of the vehicle which was seized in connection with DRI Case No. 02/CL/NDPS/GANJA/DRI/GZU/2022-23 dated 08.04.2022.
3. The brief fact of the case is that a specific intelligence was received from the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence(DRI), Lucknow on 07.04.2022 to the effect that a truck bearing Regd. No. JK-02-BL-8199 was transporting huge quantity of cannabis(ganja) hidden beneath the cover load of rubber and the said truck was proceeding from Tripura. On receipt of the information, a team of DRI officers started keeping surveillance and vigil in the said truck which was coming from Jorabat side. On the next date i.e. on 08.04.2022, the DRI officers spotted a truck bearing Regd. No. JK-02-BL-8199 coming from Jorabat side and when the truck approached, DRI officers asked the said driver of the truck to stop the vehicle on the road side near Khanapara Flyover, Guwahati. The person sitting on the driver seat of the truck introduced himself as Vikram Singh and further informed that he was coming from Agartala and going to Jalandhar, Punjab. Initially, the driver of the truck denied carrying any contraband in his truck, however, on repeated enquiry by the DRI officers about cannabis(ganja), the driver confessed that ganja was loaded in the truck between the rubber load.
4. Since the place of interception was a busy National Highway and not conducive for thorough examination of the truck load and further seizure formalities, the DRI officers decided to take the said truck to the DRI office. Thereafter, the driver Vikram Singh along with truck was taken to DRI office at Christian Basti, Guwahati. Then, the driver disclosed that the packet containing cannabis(ganja) were kept in the middle of the bedload of the truck and covered on top with packages containing rubber sheets. A total of 80 packets of cannabis(ganja) wrapped with brown adhesive tapes found in the said truck. The collective weight of the recovered ganja was found to be at 1218.250 kg. which is a commercial quantity in terms of Section 2 of the NDPS Act. The driver of the truck could not produce any valid document in respect of legal possession/transportation or carrying or recovery of 80 packets of ganja and confessed his guilt for illegal possession of cannabis(ganja).
5. Thereafter, necessary formalities were undergone and contraband including the said truck were seized as per seizure memo on the same date and after complying with all the mandatory provisions of the Act, the driver namely, Vikram Singh was arrested and produced before the CJM, Kamrup(M) on 09.04.2022 and then he was sent to judicial custody. Thereafter, the inventory of the seized goods was certified by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Guwahati.
6. On 18.04.2022, one Ranbir Singh, the Controlling Manager of TCI Freight filed a petition before the Sessions Judge, Kamrup(M) praying for zimma of natural rubber. On 19.04.2022, a report was called for from the investigating officer as to whether the goods can be released. The investigating officer on receipt of the order, submitted a report by stating that no linkage was found between the owner of the rubber and syndicate who are involved in transportation of cannabis(ganja) and further stated that in case of release of seized rubber, investigation may not hamper. Thereafter, on the basis of the report of the I/O, the learned Sessions Judge, allowed the prayer of the applicant and gave zimma of the seized goods.
7. Subsequently, on 13.06.2022, the Sessions Judge, Kamrup(M) passed an order
Raghbir Singh alias Beera Vs. State of Punjab
Union of India Vs. Mohanlal and another reported in (2016) 3 SCC 379
A registered owner of a vehicle seized in connection with a narcotics offence, who is not an accused, is entitled to interim custody of the vehicle, subject to meeting certain conditions to ensure co....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the trial court has the discretion to grant interim custody of a vehicle seized under the NDPS Act under Section 451 of the Cr.P.C., and there....
The court ruled that a vehicle seized under the NDPS Act can be released on interim custody unless the owner is implicated in the unlawful use, affirming the application of Sections 451 and 457 of th....
Confiscation and release of vehicle – Decision regarding confiscation of any article can be taken only by Special Court and only after conviction, acquittal or discharge – There is no provision for p....
The Special Court under the NDPS Act can grant interim custody of seized vehicles, provided the owner proves non-involvement in the offence, despite potential confiscation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the power to decide the claim of a person regarding a seized conveyance lies with the special court under Section 60 and 63 of the NDPS Act, a....
The ownership of a vehicle seized under NDPS Act must be respected if the owner proves lack of knowledge of its illegal use; interim custody can be granted subject to conditions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.