SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Gau) 292

MANISH CHOUDHURY
Babul Das, S/o Late Gopal Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. B. Rahman, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Mr. M. Chetia, Mr. M. Nath, Mr. A. Bhattacharya, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner assailing the action on the part of the respondent Mangaldoi Municipal Board authorities in settling the Fish Market in favour of the respondent no. 6 inter alia on the ground that the bid of the petitioner was found to be a valid one; the petitioner’s offered bid value was a higher one than that of the respondent no. 6 and there was infraction of Rule 7 of “the Rules for Procedure for the Sale of Pounds and Markets by Municipal Boards and Town Committees in Assam”, on the part of the respondent Mangaldoi Municipal Board authorities in granting the settlement.

2. The facts which are necessary for adjudication of the issue raised in this writ petition, can be delineated, in brief, as follows:-

2.1 A Tender Notice dated 27.04.2022 [‘the Tender Notice’] for settlement of markets/parking stands/fisheries, etc. was published by the Chairman, Mangaldoi Municipal Board inviting sealed bids from intending bidders for settlement of a number of markets. By the said Tender Notice


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top