IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
Jayeda Begum, W/o-Lt. Saifuz Zaman – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam – Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) no. 923 of 2023
Decided on : 24-02-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Right to Public Services Act, 2012 - Section 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14 - Assam Right to Public Services Act, 2012 - Assam Right to Public Services [Amendment] Act, 2019 - Regular family pension - Issue Certificate - Petitioner seeking direction to issue a Next of Kin [NoK] Certificate to petitioner on basis of her application submitted without further delay so as to enable petitioner to receive pension and other service benefits of her deceased husband – Held, Court on analysis of provisions of statutory remedy available to petitioner, is of considered view that such remedy is an efficacious and adequate one providing also for an appeal and a second appeal as well as imposition of penalty in event provisions provided in statute and rules framed thereunder, that is, ARTPS Act and ARTPS Rules are not followed in extending notified public service - Court holds that this writ petition is not to be entertained and accordingly, it is not entertained - Since designated public servant in case in hand has already acknowledged receipt of application of petitioner and has conducted hearings for purpose of deciding matter of issuance or otherwise of Next of Kin [NoK] Certificate, he is obligated under ARTPS Act and ARTPS Rules to arrive at a decision thereon within stipulated time period provided – Ordered accordingly.
JUDGMENT :
The petitioner has instituted the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking inter alia a direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondent authorities, more particularly, the respondent no. 2 to issue a Next of Kin [NoK] Certificate to the petitioner on the basis of her application submitted on 23.09.2022 without further delay so as to enable the petitioner to receive the pension and other service benefits of her deceased husband and also to receive regular family pension as per the extant rules in force.
2. The case projected by the petitioner, in brief, is that the husband of the petitioner viz. Saifuz Zaman was a Junior Engineer in the Public Works Department [PWD], Government of Assam and he retired from service on superannuation in June, 2018. After his retirement, Saifuz Zaman submitted all the necessary papers before the concerned authorities for finalization and payment of his monthly pension as well as other retirement benefits. While the process of finalization of monthly pension and other retirement benefits was in progress, Saifuz Zaman expired on 09.07.2020 without receiving any monthly pension and other retirement benefits.
2.1. According to the petitioner, Saifuz Zaman married twice during his life time. The first wife of Saifuz Zaman was one Nabina Khanam [the respondent no. 4]. It is the case of the petitioner that the marriage between Saifuz Zaman and the respondent no. 4 was dissolved on 30.03.2020 by pronouncement of Talak as per the Mohammadan law. The petitioner has claimed that after dissolution of the first marriage, the respondent no. 4 left the company of Saifuz Zaman and was living separately and independently with her children as divorced wife. Saifuz Zaman had two daughters with the respondent no. 4 and, on the other hand, he had two sons from the marriage with the petitioner.
2.2. Prior to his demise, Saifuz Zaman filled up nomination form nominating the petitioner as his nominee before the concerned authorities. After the demise of Saifuz Zaman, the petitioner stated to have approached the employer of Saifuz Zaman for release of the family pension, arrear monthly pension and other retirement benefits entitled to her husband viz. Saifuz Zaman. When so approached, the employer had asked for submission of a Next of Kin [NoK] certificate for processing the matters of family pension, arrear monthly pension and other retirement benefits in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner has stated that she had submitted an application online for issuance of a Next of Kin [NoK] certificate in her favour on 23.09.2020. The petitioner has learnt that the divorced wife of Saifuz Zaman had also submitted a separate application for issuance of legal heir certificate for inclusion of her name as Next of Kin [NoK] of Late Saifuz Zaman. In order to process the Next of Kin [NoK] Certificate, the respondent no. 3 had conducted hearings also by securing the appearance of the petitioner and the respondent no. 4 before by sending to the petitioner and the respondent no. 4. But despite hearings, the Next of Kin [NoK] Certificate has not been issued. Hence, the writ petition.
3. I have heard Mr. H. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R. Talukdar, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 1 – 3.
4. Mr. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that pursuant to submission of an application for Next of Kin [NoK] Certificate on 23.09.2020, the respondent no. 3 issued notices on 21.09.2021 and 06.12.2021 to the petitioner as well as the divorced first wife of Saifuz Zaman to attend hearings at his office on 04.10.2021 and 13.12.2021 along with all the relevant documents relating to their relationship with Late Saifuz Zaman. According to the petitioner, the petitioner had attended the hearings before the respondent no. 3 and was
Baburam Prakash Chandra Maheshwari vs. Antarim Zila Parish Ad Now Zila Parishad three judges Bench
Thansing Nathmal and others vs. Superintendent of Taxes, Dhubri and others
Point of Law : It is a settled position of law that when there is an alternative and equally efficacious statutory remedy available for relief the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Co....
The right to receive pensionary benefits is constitutional and cannot be denied based on non-regularization of service, particularly after long continuous service, as it violates principles of fairne....
The nomination in service records is decisive for entitlement to death-cum-retirement benefits, and a succession certificate does not confer beneficial interest.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the availability of an alternative statutory remedy under the Assam Right to Public Services Act, 2012, and the court's emphasis on the petitioner ....
The denial of family pension based on unreasonable deductions of service years violates legal principles of fairness; unmarried dependent daughters are entitled to pension as per amended Rule 143.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.