THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Devashis Baruah, J.
Pabitra Boro And Ors. S/o Lt. Gari Boro - Appellant
Vs.
Sabitri Nath W/o Lt. Bhuban Nath - Respondent
CRP(IO) No. 113 of 2021
Decided On : 25-01-2023
Assam Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2010 – Sections 13 and 14 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Land Grabbing - Cognizable offence - Superintending Powers - Whether petitioner has right title and interest with possession over schedule land - Held, From a reading of said Section it would transpire that land grabbing would be every activity of a land grabber to occupy or attempting to occupy with or without use of force threat intimidation and deceit any land including a land of a private person over which he or they have no ownership title or physical possession without any lawful entitlement and with a view to illegally taking possession of such land or creating illegal tenancies or lease or licence agreements or by constructing unauthorized structures thereon for sale or hire or use or occupation of such unauthorized structures and the term grabbed land shall be construed accordingly - Therefore in order that activity be construed to be a land grabbing person concerned against whom proceedings have been initiated in view of Section 11 has to show that either he has ownership or title to or physical possession with lawful entitlement of land grabbed - Petition Dismissed.
JUDGEMENT AND ORDER :
Heard Mr. B. D. Deka, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. M. Talukdar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent.
2. This is an application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the judgment dated 07.09.2021 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Special Tribunal, Kamrup (M) under Assam Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2010 (for short the “Act of 2010”) in L.G. Case No.17/2015.
3. At the outset, it is relevant to take note of that against the judgment and decree passed in a proceedings under the Act of 2010, an appeal lies before a Special Court on any question of law or fact under Section 13 of the Act of 2010. Section 13(2) of the Act of 2010 provides, separate appeal against the respective judgment and order of the Special Tribunal passed in respect of the civil proceedings as well as in criminal proceedings respectively and the period of limitation is 60 days from the respective date of judgment and order passed in each of the said proceedings. However as on date, as admitted in bar, there is no Special Court constituted in terms with Section 14 of the Act of 2010 and under such circumstances the instant application has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
4. Taking into account that as there is no appellate forum constituted and the instant application has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution thereby invoking the Superintending Powers of this Court, this Court vide an order dated 15.11.2021 admitted the instant application on the following question:
5. To appreciate the question so framed, it would be relevant to take note of the brief facts of the instant case. For the purpose of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as in the same status as they stood before the Tribunal below. The respondent herein as applicant had filed an application under Section 8(2) of the Act of 2010 against four respondents out of which the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 are the petitioners before this Court.
6. The case of the applicant is that the husband of the applicant purchased from one Kanailal Sikaria through registered Sale Deed No.7089 dated 06.10.1972 a plot of land measuring 33 Bighas 17 Lechas and the same was mutated in the name of her husband late Bhuban Nath. It is the further case of the applicant that after acquiring the ownership, the applicant’s husband took over the possession of the land in the year 1972 itself. During the lifetime of her husband in the month of February, 2009, the respondents tried to occupy the plot of land but could not succeed to do so. Thereafter, upon the expiry of her husband on 25.06.2013, the applicant being a widow and helpless woman, the respondents encroached upon the land of the applicant and started constructing temporary houses and thereafter permanent structures etc. upon the disputed land. The applicant tried her best to persuade the respondents not to do so but the respondents refused to vacate the possession or stop construction over the disputed plots of land. Under such circumstances, the applicant filed the application under Section 8(2) of the Act of 2010. The said application so filed was registered and numbered as L.G. Case No.17/2015.
7. The Court of the Additional District and Sessions Judge No.1 which have been designated as Special Tribunal, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati vide an order dated 10.09.2015 issued notice upon the Circle Officer, Dispur Revenue Circle for inspection and verification of a plot of land measuring 2 Bigha 1 Katha covered by Dag No. 1484, 1485, 1487 and 1486 of Patta No.712, Village No.2, Maidam under Beltola Mouza in the District of Kamrup (M), Assam and to submit a full and complete report within 3 (three) weeks from the date
Thomas Cook (India) Ltd. Vs. Hotel Imperial reported in (2006) 88 DRJ 545
Ravinder Kaur Grewal and Others Vs. Manjit Kaur and Others reported in (2019) 8 SCC 729
Possession without lawful entitlement constitutes land grabbing; mere long-term possession does not confer legal title under the Assam Land Grabbing Act, 2010.
"Land grabber" means a person or a group of person who occupy or attempt to occupy with or without use of force, threat, intimidation and deceit, land over which he or they have no ownership, title o....
The proceedings under the Assam Land (Grabbing) Act are specialized to expedite resolution of land disputes, and judicial interference is unwarranted at interlocutory stages.
It is well settled principle of law there is a presumption in favour of constitutionality of a statute. While deciding validity of a statute, it would be endeavour of court to find out the intention ....
A Judgment and Order of the Special Tribunal under the Assam Land Grabbing [Prohibition] Act, 2010, deciding the civil liability, is a judicial order of a civil court and cannot be challenged in the ....
It would appear that person who has title or ownership or physical possession over the land, cannot be termed as a land grabber.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.