JUDGMENT & ORDER :

N. Kotiswar Singh, J.

Heard Ms. A. Gayan, learned Central Government Counsel appearing for the appellants. Also heard Mr. A.K. Baruah, learned counsel appearing for the respondents in Writ Appeal No.11/2023 and Writ Appeal No.394/2022.

2. These three writ appeals have been preferred by the Union of India against the common judgment & order dated 08.12.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.6696/2022; WP(C) No.6695/2022 and WP(C) No.6698/2022.

3. As these appeals arise from the common judgment & order, they have been tagged, heard and disposed of together by this common judgment & order. The respondents No.2 in all the writ appeals are the minor students of Sainik School, Goalpara, who are represented by their parents, i.e. respondent No.1 in these appeals.

4. Brief facts for deciding the present appeals are that on certain alleged ground of misconduct, disciplinary actions were initiated against all the respondent No.2, i.e. the students (writ petitioner No.2 in all the writ petitions), by the school authorities for which they were placed under suspension and the enquiry was initiated against them. However, after they were placed under suspension before c