Back
KAKHETO SEMA
Thejangulie Kachari, S/o. Lt. Bijoy Kachari – Appellant
Versus
State of Nagaland represented by the Chief Secretary to the Government of Nagaland, Kohima – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Ms. Z. Zhimomi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. V. Suokhrie, learned Addl. Advocate General for the State respondents. Also heard Mr. N. Mozhui, learned counsel for the respondent No.4.
2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner impugning the order dated 23/11/2017 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Dimapur, dismissing the claim made by the petitioner on the land covered by Dag No. 31, Block No. 8 in Dimapur Mouza, and directing the petitioner not to disturb the peaceful occupation of the land by the respondent No.4.
3. The case of the petitioner in brief is recited as under;
(ii) That by t
The court ruled that new evidence discovered post-judgment does not justify a review unless it was part of the original record.
Point of Law : In exercising power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the High Court is not just a Court of law but is also a Court of Equity and a person who invokes the High Court’s ju....
Revenue authorities lack jurisdiction to determine land title disputes, which must be settled in civil courts, rendering related appeals maintainable under proper legal challenges.
Revenue Authorities cannot adjudicate land title disputes; such matters must be resolved by Civil Courts under the Assam Land Revenue Regulation, 1886.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and providing a reasonable opportunity for the parties to present their case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
