IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
KALYAN RAI SURANA, MITALI THAKURIA, JJ.
Khadem Bhakta Singh, S/o Late Chandra Moni Chakma – Appellant
Versus
The State Of AP – Respondent
Crl.A(J)/03 (AP) of 2022
Decided on : 20-04-2023
POCSO Act, 2012 - Section 6 - Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 341/376(2)(f) - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 374(2) – Offence of Rape – Wrongful restraint – Charged - Present accused/appellant, took his stepdaughter, who was about 10 years of age, inside jungle and raped her - As per allegation, on , while victim (name withheld) visited resident of one neighbor along with youngest son of appellant and were playing with the other kids, accused/appellant went to the resident of said neighbor and asked the victim (his stepdaughter) and his son to come back to their home and he also accompanied both of them while they were coming back to home - But, on midway, accused asked his son to go back home alone and took victim, i.e. his stepdaughter, towards jungle and inside jungle, he forcefully raped his stepdaughter, who was about 10 years of age - When her brother came back home alone, mother of victim went to road in search of her daughter and after sometime, she found her coming home and was crying – Held, it is seen that in spite of specific allegation brought against the present accused/appellant, he could not rebut the evidence of P.W.-6, victim of this case, nor he could produce any defence evidence to rebut prosecution case - Thus, he failed to discharge his burden and accordingly, it can be presumed, under Section 29 of POCSO Act, that accused has committed alleged offence - More so, from discussion made above, it is seen that there is nothing to disbelieve minor victim of this case and it is also seen that prosecution has able to prove entire chain of circumstances - In the present case, it is seen that accused/appellant, being stepfather of victim, instead of protecting his minor daughter did not hesitate to commit such a heinous offence on his stepdaughter - It is also established that he committed said offence earlier occasion also that too with his stepdaughter - Appeal stands dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
M. Thakuria, J.
Heard Ms. J. Doji, learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant. Also heard Ms.T. Jini, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Arunachal Pradesh.
2. This jail appeal, under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the judgment & order dated 30.03.2021, passed by the learned Special Judge, POCSO, at Khonsa, in KSA POCSO Case No. 28/2020, in connection with Kharsang P.S. Case No. 09/2020, under Sections 341/376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code readwith Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, whereby, the Special Judge, POCSO, Khonsa, Tirap District, Arunachal Pradesh, has convicted the present accused/appellant under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and thereby sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and with a fine of Rs. 20,000/- in default to undergo S.I. for another 2 (two) months for the offence of aggravated penetrative sexual assault on his step daughter.
3. The brief facts, leading to this appeal, is that on 22.08.2020, one Mrs. Basanti Singh, mother of the victim, lodged an F.I.R. with the Officer-In-Charge, Kharsang Police Station, alleging that on the same day, at around 2.30 p.m., the present accused/appellant-Shri Bhakto Singh, took his stepdaughter, who was about 10 years of age, inside the jungle and raped her. As per the allegation, on 22.08.2020, while the victim (name withheld) visited the resident of one neighbor-Sidananda Dihingya along with the youngest son of the appellant and were playing with the other kids, the accused/appellant went to the resident of the said neighbor and asked the victim (his stepdaughter) and his son to come back to their home and he also accompanied both of them while they were coming back to home. But, on the midway, the accused asked his son to go back home alone and took the victim, i.e. his stepdaughter, towards the jungle and inside the jungle, he forcefully raped his stepdaughter, who was about 10 years of age. When her brother came back home alone, the mother of the victim went to the road in search of her daughter and after sometime, she found her coming home and was crying. On inquiry, she discloses everything to her mother and then the mother of the victim called the neighbours, but during that time, the accused/ appellant ran away from the spot and the mother of the victim immediately took the victim to the hospital as she was profusely bleeding through her genital organ and was also suffering from stomach pain. Thereafter, the mother of the victim lodged the F.I.R. against the present accused/appellant.
4. Upon receipt of the F.I.R., the Officer-In-Charge, Kharsang Police Station, registered the case, being Kharsang P.S. Case No. 09/2020, under Sections 341/376(2)(f) IPC read with Section 04/06 of POCSO Act, and started investigation. During investigation, the I.O. recorded the statement of the victim and also forwarded her to PHC, Kharsang, for her medical examination and treatment and arrested the present accused/appellant and also forwarded him for medical examination to PHC. Penal and vaginal swab of the accused as well as the victim were also collected and sent for FSL examination. Thereafter, the I.O. visited the place of occurrence and drawn rough sketch map of the PO, which was a jungle near Coke Bhatta at Longtom-I Village, where some bamboo plants and small pond were there. The Birth Certificate of the victim and her wearing apparels were also seized by the I.O. and after recording the statements of all the witnesses and collecting medical report etc., the I.O. laid Charge-Sheet against the present accused/appellant under Sections 341/376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code readwith Section 4/6 of the POCSO Act. Thereafter, the learned Special Judge, POCSO, provided a copy, under Section 207 Cr.P.C., to the present accused/appellant and he expressed his inability to engage counsel and accordingly, a State defence counsel was engaged for him for his defence.
5. The prosecution examined as many as 9 (nine) num
Bharwada Bhoginbhi Hirjubhai V. State of Gujarat
Hemmat Sukhadeo Wahurwagh Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (2009) 6 SCC 712 (FB)
The judgment established the distinction between rape and sexual assault, emphasizing the requirement of penetration for the former, and the physical contact without penetration for the latter under ....
The court established that a minor's testimony can be sufficient for conviction in sexual assault cases, even without corroborative medical evidence, if it is credible.
The appellant's position of trust and authority over the child victim led to his conviction under Section 6 of the POCSO Act.
The victim's testimony in sexual assault cases is vital and can suffice for conviction without corroboration, provided it is credible.
The court emphasized the reliability of the victim's testimony while clarifying that mere sexual assault does not meet the threshold for aggravated charges under POCSO, which necessitates proof of pe....
The reliability of the prosecutrix's testimony and the admissibility of res gestae evidence were central to the court's decision.
The court established that in cases of sexual assault, the victim's testimony can be sufficient for conviction, and that slight penetration constitutes an offense under the POCSO Act, regardless of t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.