MITALI THAKURIA
Koj Nadam, S/o Sri Koj Gyati – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. S. Koyang, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Tapin, learned Senior Government Advocate representing State respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4 & 5; Mr. D. Kamduk, learned Standing Counsel, Land Management Department, representing respondent No. 2 and Mr. M. Kato, learned DSGI representing respondent No. 6.
2. This is an application filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari/mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction of like nature directing the respondent authorities for payment of solatium amount to the petitioner, at the rate of 100% of the compensation amount, under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
3. The brief facts of the present writ petition is that the Government of Arunachal Pradesh, through the Secretary (Land Management), Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar, issued a public Notification, vide No. LM-14/2014, dated 17.02.2014, under Section 10 of the Balipara/Tirap/Sadiya Frontier Tract Jhum Land Regulation Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Regulation of 1947’), expressing the
H.D Vora v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Basanti Prasad Vs. Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board & Ors.
Durga Prasad v. Chief Controller of Imports and Exports & Ors.
Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag & Anr. v. Mst. Katiji & Ors.
Dehri Rohtas Light Railway Company Ltd. v. District Board, Bhojpur & Ors.
Dayal Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Shankara Co-op Housing Society Ltd. v. M. Prabhakar & Ors.
Sunder Vs. Union of India reported in (2001) 7 SCC 211
Nagain Das Jain (Since Deceased) by LRS Vs. Agra Nagar Mahapalika, Agra
P. C. Goswami Vs. Collector of Darrang
P.S. Sadasivaswamy v. State of T.N. AIR 1974 SC 2271
State of M.P. & Ors. v. Nandlal Jaiswal & Ors.
Sudama Devi Vs. Commissioner & Ors.
Tukaram Kana Joshi & Ors. Vs. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation & Ors.
Tridip Kumar Dingal & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Ors.
The Supreme Court ruled Section 3-J of the National Highways Act unconstitutional, affirming landowners' right to solatium and interest, recognizing it as a constitutional obligation of the State.
Concluded acquisitions under the old regulation preclude reopening for additional compensation, including Solatium, after acceptance of initial compensation.
The acquisition process does not lapse under section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation has been tendered to the landowners and possession of the land has been taken by the acquiring authority.
There is no provision for payment of solatium and interest in Regulation of 1947, whereas same is available in RFCT & LARR Act.
The principle of administrative finality prohibits reopening concluded land acquisition proceedings where compensation has been fully determined, disbursed, and accepted. Subsequent judicial interpre....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.