N.SESHASAYEE
Etti Gounder – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Namakkal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer in WP.No.3323 of 2020: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the respondents to compute and pay to the petitioners for acquisition of their lands measuring 4000 sq.mts., in Survey No.44/1B, Annathanapatti Village covered under Award of the 6th respondent dated 27.06.2008 in R.O.C.No,1299/2008 (A2) as modified by the arbitral award of the 5th respondent dated 08.11.2012 in NH.No.47 Aa.Va.No.554/B2, the benefits under Section 23(1A), 23(2), and the proviso to Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
WP.Nos.697, 701, 716, 721, 722, 724, 725, 733, 744, 746, 747, 748, 980, 983, 985 of 2021 : Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents herein to pay solatium amount at 30% as per Section 23(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and an additional amount at 12% as per Section 23(1-A) of the said Act, 1894 from the date of notification under Section 3A(1) of National Highways Act, 1956, to the date of award for the compensation amount as enh
Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha Vs Union of India [(2015)3 SCC 1]
Assistant Commissioner (Ct) Ltu
Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v State of Madhya Pradesh [AIR 1955 SC 781]
Bharat Kala Mandir v Municipal Committee
Chakrapani v Union of India [(2011) 7 MLJ 858]
D.Cawasji v State of Mysore [(1975) 1 SCC 636]
Daryao and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [AIR 1961 SC 1457]
Delhi Airtech Services Private Limited v State of U.P [2011 9 SCC 354]
Goan Real Estate v Union of India [(2010) 5 SCC 388)
Indore Development Authority vs. Manoharlal [(2020 (8) SCC 129]
K.T. Plantation (P) Ltd. v. State of Karnataka
K.S Venkataraman v State of Madras [AIR 1966 SC 1089]
Khoday Distilleries v Sri Mahadeshwara [(2019) 4 SCC 376]
Kapila Hingorani (1) V State of Bihar [(2003)6 SCC 1 : 2004 SCC (L & S)586
Kusum Ingots and Alloys Ltd v Union of India
Lalaram v. Jaipur Development Authority [(2016) 11 SCC 31]
Maneka Gandhi V Union of India [(1978)1 SCC 248]
Mafatlal Industries Ltd and others vs. Union of India and others [(1997 (5) SCC 536
Mahabir Kishore v State of Madhya Pradesh [(1989) 4 SCC 1]
Narain Das Jain v. Agra Nagar Mahapalika [(1991) 4 SCC 212]
Nagpur Improvement Trust v Vithal Rao [AIR 1973 SC 689]
Narain Das Jain v. Agra Nagar Mahapalika [(1991) 4 SCC 212]
Olga Tellis V Bombay Municipal Corpn. [(1985)3 SCC 545]
Punjab National Bank vs. D.C.Krishna [2001 (6) SCC 569]
Sheela Devi vs. Jaspal Singh [AIR 1999 SC 2859]
Simplex Infrastructure Ltd. v. Union of India
State Bank of Travancore vs. Mathew K.C.
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Bhailal Bhailal Bhai [AIR 1964 SC 1006]
State Of Maharashtra vs Digambar [AIR 1995 SC 1991]
Shenoy and Co. V. CTO [(1985) 2 SCC 512]
State of M.P. v. Bhailal Bhai [AIR 1964 SC 1006]
State Of U.P.& Ors vs Arvind Kumar Srivastava & Others [(2015)1 SCC 347]
Thansingh Vs. Superintendent of Taxes
Trilokchand Motichand and others Vs H.B. Munshi & another [AIR 1970 SC 898]
Tarsem Singh v Union of India [(2019) 9 SCC 304]
Union of India vs. T.R.Verma [AIR 1957 SC 882]
Uttaranchal Jal Sansthan v Laxmi Devi [(2009) 7 SCC 205]
U.P Pollution Control Board v Kanoria Industrial Limited [(2001) 2 SCC 549]
Union of India & Another vs M.M. Sarkar [(2010)2 SCC 59)]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.