SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Gau) 558

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
M/s Barak Warehouse Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam And 2 Ors. – Respondent
WP(C) 4575 of 2021
Decided on : 09-05-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR. N J KHATANIAR
For the Respondent: SC, EXCISE DEPTT.

Headnote:

Assam Excise Act, 2016 - Assam Excise Rules, 2016 - Rule 1(A) (xvii) - Assam VAT Act of 2003 – Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14 - Bonded warehouse - Change in status - Whether respondent authorities could have imposed upon petitioners establishment charges in terms with Clause 9 of order of Governor – Held, Respondent authorities have taken any action as regards dead/unfit stocks which have been mentioned in reports submitted by the Head of the Joint Team in terms with Clause 6 of the order - Court directs respondent authorities to take a definitive decision on claims of petitioners in respect to dead/unfit stocks within a period of 2 months from date a certified copy of judgment is served upon Commissioner of Excise - Petitioners dehors exercise to be carried out as directed in instant paragraph shall continue to remain liable to pay establishment charges till such time excise duty and VAT payable is not settled completely and/or till such demand is not set aside in accordance with law - There were certain sub-committees formed for purpose of verification as regards ad-valorem excise duty and VAT by bifurcating those saleable stocks with unfit and dead stocks - Submission of learned counsel for petitioners that respondent authorities, more particularly, Commissioner of Excise should also be directed to take note of those aspects of matters while demanding establishment charges - Petitioners are liable to pay establishment charges in terms with Clause 9 of order till payment of ad-valorem excise duty as well as VAT on basis of orders passed by authorities in terms with Clause 3 of office order are not paid or such amount so demanded are not set aside in accordance with law- Petitions disposed off.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr.P. Bora, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. H.K. Sarma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in W.P.(C) No.8463/2018, W.P.(C) No.653/2019 & W.P.(C) No.1250/2019 and Mr. N.J Khataniar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in W.P.(C) No. 1000/2019, W.P.(C) No. 6347/2018, W.P.(C) No.6347/2018, W.P.(C) No.6268/2018, W.P.(C) No.6268/2018, W.P.(C) No.6266/2018, W.P.(C) No.6256/2018 & W.P.(C) No.6141/2018. I have also heard Mr. K.P. Pathak, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the Excise Department.

2. The primary issue involved in the present batch of writ petitions is as to whether the respondent authorities could have imposed upon the petitioners the establishment charges in terms with Clause 9 of the order of the Governor dated 29/8/2016.

3. The facts relevant in the instant batch of the writ petitions are that the petitioners herein prior to 1/9/2016 were license bonded warehouses. However, prior to coming into effect of the Assam Excise Act, 2016 (for short the ‘Act of 2016’) w.e.f. 1/9/2016, an issue arose in view of the change in the status of the bonded warehouse as it was defined in terms with the Act of 2016.

4. A perusal of the Assam Excise Rules, 2016 (for short the ‘the Rules of 2016’) framed under the Act of 2016 shows that the term “bonded warehouse” has been defined in Rule 1(A) (xvi) to mean the premises or any part of the premises within a manufactory and/or within a canteen store depot warehouse approved and licensed for deposit or storage of spirits on which duty has not been paid. On the other hand, Rule 1(A) (xvii) defines ‘wholesale warehouses’ to mean those premises or any part of the premises approved and licensed for deposit or storage of spirits on which duty/levy has been paid and from where India made foreign liquor may be supplied by wholesale. In view of the change of the definition of ‘bonded warehouses’ in terms with the Rules of 2016 which now requires to be within the manufactory, the petitioners herein in the present batch of writ petitions in view of the definition could not retain the character of a ‘bonded warehouses’ and came within the ambit of the ‘wholesale warehouses’. With the change in the character of the petitioners’ business from ‘bonded warehouses’ to ‘wholesale warehouses’ an important issue arose inasmuch as in ‘bonded warehouses’, the Indian Made Foreign Liquor(IMFL) were stored or deposited without payment of the duty whereas in ‘wholesale warehouses’ ‘the deposit or storage of IMFL had to be with payment of duty/levy. In view of the changes which were going to be effected w.e.f. 1/9/2016, the Governor of Assam passed an order on 29/8/2016. A perusal of the said order reflects that a joint team was constituted as per the said Order who shall take stock of all such transitional taxable under-bond stock of liquor/spirit in the erstwhile bonded warehouses (now wholesale warehouse licensees) as on the date preceding the date of coming into effect of the Act of 2016 and the Rules of 2016 including the stock in-transit, the value of such stock as per the Books of Accounts and were required to calculate and record the Govt. levies involved on such stock, including the ad-valorem levy and VAT, as per the Rules of 2016 and the Assam VAT Act of 2003 as amended. Clause 3(a) and 3(b) of the said Order being relevant are reproduced herein under :

“3. (a) On receipt of such report from the concerned Head of the Joint Team, the Excise Commissioner shall pass an order to the effect that the entire amount of ad-valorem levy involved on the transitional taxable under-bond stock of liquor be deposited by the licensees of the erstwhile bonded warehouses (now Wholesale Warehouse licensees) at the rate applicable under the new Assam Excise Rules, 2016 within a period of three (3) months from the date of coming into


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top