Prey Khyora Riyang vs State Of A. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Gau) 588

MARLI VANKUNG
Prey Khyora Riyang – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :S Ampi Advocate
For the Respondent: T Epa

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. R. Sonar, learned counsel for the petitioner along with Ms. R. Basar, learned Junior Government Advocate for the State respondents and Mr. H. Lampu, earned counsel for the respondent No.6.

2. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of the appropriate Writ against the respondent. The petitioner’s case is that the petitioner was appointed as Anganwadi Worker against the Additional Anganwadi Centres/villages at Khyora, Khenewa Circle under the Bameng, ICDS Project with effect from 1st February, 2010 at the monthly honorarium of Rs. 1438/-as fixed by the Government vide Order dated 25.02.2010 by the Child Development Project Officer (CDPO), East Kameng District, Bameng.

3. That the services of the petitioner was terminated w.e.f. 24.05.2016 vide the Office Order No.BMG/ICDS/APPT-01/2013-14 dated 24.05.2016 on the purported ground of non-performance of duty and being uneducated and thereafter, vide the Office Order No. BMG/ICDS/APPT-01/2013-14 dated 27.05.2016, the respondent No.5 was appointed as Anganwadi Worker and place of the petitioner;

Aggrieved by these 2 (two) Orders, the petitioner has filed the ins

Click Here to Read the rest of this document