ANAND PATHAK
SEEMA W/o UDAY SINGH JATAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
ORDER : – The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs : –
“(a) That, the order Annexure P/1 may kindly be quashed. (b) That, any other just and proper relief, warranting under the facts and circumstances of the case be also given to the petitioners, including cost, in the ends of justice. 7.1 (a) That, the respondent be directed to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits.”
2. Present petition is preferred against the order dated 7-10-2015 passed by the Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Gohad, District Bhind (respondent No. 3 herein), whereby services of petitioner from the post of Aanganwadi Sahayika have been terminated.
3. Precisely stated facts of the case are that petitioner was appointed as Aanganwadi Sahayika vide order dated 19-3-2010 and worked for more than 5 years on the said post. It appears from the impugned order that on 7-10-2015, Commissioner, Chambal Division, Morena (respondent No. 2 herein) visited Aanganwadi Kendra No. 3 at Gurikha where petitioner was posted and found her absent. Therefore, he instructed the Project Officer to ta
State of U. P. and others vs. Maharaja Dharmander Prasad Singh and others
Kansa vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Pancham Chand and others vs. State of H. P. and others
Radha Krishan Industries vs. State of H. P. and others
Whirlpool Corporation vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai and others
Harbanslal Sahnia and another vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.