ROBIN PHUKAN, KARDAK ETE
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Phassang Yachang W/o Shri Tarh Taigh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
KARDAK ETE, J.
1. Heard Mr. S. Tapin, learned Senior Government Advocate for the appellants and Mr. D. Kamduk, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This intra-Court Appeal has been preferred by the State of Arunachal Pradesh represented by the Chief Secretary, Government of Arunachal Pradesh against the order dated 29.07.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C)/254/2022.
3. The facts leading to the filing of the present appeal is that the respondents/ petitioners (17 in numbers) who are Government Employees have been allotted Government quarters at Papu Hill, Naharlagun and they have been staying in their respective quarters with their family. In the meantime, the State Government in the Department of Housing has issued an order dated 30.06.2022, wherein the PWD, Naharlagun Division had proposed to construct multi-storeyed flats in place of the old quarters at Papu Hill, Naharlagun. In order to pave way for the said proposed construction, an alternate accommodation has been provided to the respondents/petitioners, whose quarters are proposed for demolition for reconstruction. The respondents/ petitioners being the occupants of the government quarters which are sou
Chameli Singh and Others vs. State of U.P. and Another
Ms Shantistar Builders vs. Narayan Khimalal Totame and Others
Right to shelter does not mean a mere right to a roof over one's head but right to all infrastructure necessary to enable them to live and develop as a human being.
Point of law: Framing a Scheme, under which the petitioner is not eligible, the plea that similar directions need to be issued to Airports Authority of India, is unmerited and is rejected.
The court held that a retired employee claiming retention of government accommodation as a Kashmiri migrant failed to meet eligibility due to ownership of alternative property, highlighting strict ad....
Positive rights are the right to shelter, the right to education, the right to health care, the right to a living wage. These things are – these are, I would call them, more properly, political right....
Eligibility for government accommodation retention requires compliance with specific transfer conditions; court upheld eviction of Kashmiri Migrants not meeting these criteria, affirming equal treatm....
Point of Law : retention of the official accommodation - petitioners being ineligible under the Office Memorandum cannot rely on order.
Out-of-turn government accommodation allotment under exigency must be by House Allotment Committee per rules; arbitrary executive directions bypassing procedure illegal, violative of equality and rul....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.