IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY, J.
Sh. Lalchhuana Ngente S/o Zaluta (L) - Appellant
Versus
The State of Mizoram and Anr. – Respondents
Crl.A. 10 of 2023, I.A.(Crl.) 13 of 2023
Decided on : 05-10-2023
Criminal Procedure Code,1973 – Section 313 and 374 (2) – POCSO Act, 2012 - Sections 4 – Offence of Sexual Offence – Appeal against judgment and order – Held, evidence of DW-1 and DW-2 do not disclose that they were present during entire period when accused and victim first entered into workshop and were with them till accused and victim left – It cannot be ruled out that they came to place of occurrence after the offence was committed inasmuch as minor victim’s testimonies that rape committed upon her was under threat, remained unshaken – In considered opinion of this Court, explanation given through DW-1 and DW-2 cannot be basis of acquitting accused more particularly in a case – Court is of view that learned trial court has not committed any error either in law or fact in convicting appellant – Order Accordingly
JUDGEMENT :
1. Heard Ms. Lalngaihsaki Fanai, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. C. Zoramchhana, learned Public Prosecutor, State of Mizoram.
2. The challenge:
The present appeal is preferred under Section 374 (2) of the Cr.P.C., 1973 against the judgment and order dated 26.08.2020 passed by the learned Special Judge, POCSO, Aizawl, Mizoramin SC No. 179/2017 in Criminal Trial No. 1441/2017 convicting the appellant under Sections 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and also against the impugned order dated 08.09.2020 by which the appellant was sentenced to undergo 7 years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 10,000/-and in default to pay the fine, another simple imprisonment of 6 months.
3. The prosecution case:
I. The prosecution case was initiated on the basis of an FIR dated 04.07.2017, wherein it was alleged that on 30.06.2017 the accused/ appellant had engaged in sexual intercourse with the victim against her will, who was 17 years & 6 months of age at the time of the incident. It is alleged that the accused had offered her a lift on his scooty on her way back from Maubawk and she accepted his offer to drop her at her residence in Tuikual Sount. However, the accused took her into his sofa workshop in Dinthar where he raped her under threat. On the basis of the said FIR, the police registered a case being Vaivakawn Police Station Case No. 97/2017 under Section 4 of the POCSO Act and after completion of the investigation laid charge-sheet under Section 4 of the POCSO Act and sent him for trial.
II. The learned trial court framed charges under Section 4 of the POCSO Act, read over and explained the same to the accused, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Accordingly, the trial commenced.
4. The prosecution witnesses:
I. To bring home the charges against the accused persons, the prosecution examined as many as 6 witnesses and exhibited certain documents including birth certificate of the victim.
II. PW1, the informant as well as the victim in her deposition stated that she was born on 11.12.1999. She started working at Hotel Clover, Chanmari from 13.01.2017 for about two months and then she shifted to Arini Hotel and she worked there for about two months. She deposed that she was preparing to go to the Andaman & Nicobar Island to work over there. She further deposed that on 30.06.2017, she had gone to Maubawk with her friend’s husband in connection with her Adhaar Card. Around 6 p.m., she started walking from Maubawk towards Tuikual, where she was staying at that time with her friends. She further deposed that the accused, who was not known to her came up on a scooter and offered her a lift and she declined the offer. She further stated that when she reached Bungkawn, she found him standing on the road and the accused again asked her to get into the scooter. She further deposed that the accused said that he would drop her and as it was raining she agreed. Then the accused took her to his sofa workshop in Dinthar, which was all dark. She further stated that the accused asked her, if she could put on her phone light. She deposed that she put the phone on and gave it to him. Then the accused immediately closed the door and put on lights on the workshop. The accused made her sit down on a sofa and gave her some liquor to drink. According to her she did not want to drink but the accused forced her to have the liquor. The accused then told her to remove her clothes and said that he would kill her if she did not obey him. Accordingly, she removed her clothes and the accused then had sex with her. She further deposed that the accused forced her to hold his penis and insert it into her vagina and said that from then she should be his wife and that he would have sex with her every day. Thereafter she asked him to take her Chanmari. She told the accused that she wanted to go to Axis bank. She further deposed that the accused waited for her near the bank and she ran to Hotel Clover to ask her friend Joseph to help her an
Rai Sandeep Alias Deepu -Vs-State (NCT of Delhi)reported in (2012) 8 SCC 21
Panchhi and Others -Vs- State of U.P.
Rai Sandeep Alias Deepu -Vs-State (NCT of Delhi)reported in (2012) 8 SCC 21
State of Maharashtra Vs. Chandraprakash Kewal Chand Jainreported in AIR 1990 SC 658
State of Himachal Pradesh -Vs- Sanjay Kumar Alias Sunny
Santosh Prasad @ Santosh Kumar vs. The State Of Bihar reported in (2020) 3 SCC 443
The testimony of a child victim in sexual offence cases can be sufficient for conviction if it is credible and corroborated by medical evidence, and the presumption of guilt under the POCSO Act appli....
Prosecution has to prove the foundational facts of the offence charged against the accused, not based on proof beyond reasonable doubt, but on the basis of preponderance of probability.
The court affirmed that the victim's consistent testimony suffices for conviction in sexual assault cases, reinforcing that age determination and credibility of the witness are pivotal in such judgme....
The testimony of a child victim is sufficient for conviction in sexual assault cases if credible, even amidst minor discrepancies and delays in FIR filing.
The testimony of a minor victim can be sufficient for conviction under the POCSO Act if it is credible, regardless of the victim's prior sexual history.
The judgment reinforces the principle that in cases under the POCSO Act, the victim's testimony can be sufficient for conviction, especially when corroborated by medical evidence, and that the burden....
Point of Law - No legal compulsion to look for any other evidence to corroborate the evidence of prosecutrix before recording an order of conviction.
The victim's testimony does not require corroboration if it inspires confidence and is found to be worthy of credence. The burden is on the accused to disprove the prosecution case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.