SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Rekha Agarwala, W/o. Late Binod Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Anuroma Das, W/o. Sri Dalim Das – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The revisional jurisdiction of this Court has been sought to be invoked by filing this petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure by which, the petitioners have put to challenge a judgment dated 22.08.2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge, No. 2, Kamrup, Guwahati in Title Appeal No. 92/2010. By the aforesaid judgment, the appeal preferred by the petitioners, as appellants against the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2010 passed by the learned Munsiff No.3, Kamrup, Guwahati in TS Case No. 659/2006, which was earlier numbered as TS No. 193/2005 has been dismissed and the judgment of the learned Trial Court has been affirmed.
2. The petitioners were the plaintiffs in the suit which was instituted for ejectment of tenant and recovery of arrear rent. While the petitioners were the landlords, the two defendants in the suit who were the tenants. At this stage itself, it is required to be noted that the respondent no. 2 has not contested the case and in this regard, this Court had passed an order dated 25.04.2013 to proceed ex-parte against the said respondent no. 2.
3. It is the case of the petitioners that since July 2004, no rent was paid or even tendered to them.
Rup Chand Daftary Vs. Ashim Ranjan Modak
Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Machado Brothers and Ors.
Manik Chand Patowa Vs. Sekhar Roy & Ors.
Abdul Matin Choudhury & Ors. Vs. Nilyananda Dutta Banik
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. Dilbahar Singh
Gandhe Vijay Kumar v. Mulji @ Mulchand
Prativa Devi (Smt) v. T.V. Krishnan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.