DEVASHIS BARUAH
Shyam Choudhury, S/o. Dhirsing Choudhury – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam, Represented by the Principal Secretary, to the Govt. Of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. F. Khan, the learned counsel for the petitioner in WP(C) No. 2164/2022 and WP(C) No. 2693/2022 as well as Mr. P. K. Bhattacharjee, the petitioner-in-person in WP(C) No.2448/2022. Also heard Mr. P. Nayak, the learned Standing Counsel, Irrigation Department, Assam and Mr. P. Mahanta, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 5 to 8 in WP(C) No.2164/2022.
2. All the three writ petitions relate to the same tender proceedings and as such this Court proposes to dispose of the three writ petitions by this common judgment.
3. The National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (for short, NABARD), by a sanction letter dated 15.02.2021, had sanctioned the loan for providing loan assistance under the Rural Infrastructure Development Fund (RIDF)-XXVI. The said sanction of the loan was in respect to 23 minor irrigation projects in 15 districts of Assam. In terms with the said sanction letter, the total outlay for the projects in question was Rs.3,500.00 lakh and the loan from NABARD was for Rs.3,325.00 lakh and the State Government was to contribute Rs.175.00 lakh. The period of completion of the projects was 31.03.2024. In the said sanction lett
M/S NG Projects Ltd. vs. M/s Vinod Kumar Jain and Others
Silppi Constructions Contractors vs. Union of India and Another
State of Jharkhand and Others vs. CWE-SOMA CONSORTIUM
Maa Binda Express Carrier and Another vs. North-East Frontier Railway and Others
Laxmikant and Others Vs. Satyawan and Others
Rajasthan Housing Board and Another vs. G. S. Investments and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.