SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Gau) 979

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY, J.
Smti. Dulumoni Das W/o Sri Monujit Mahanata – Appellant
Versus
Monujit Mahanta S/o Late Ruchi Kanta Mahanta - Respondent
Tr.P.(C). 15 of 2023
Decided on : 22-05-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR. K K HANDIQUE
For the Respondent: MR U S BORGOHAIN

Headnote:

Transfer Petition - Matrimonial Case - The court allowed the transfer of a matrimonial case from one court to another based on the comparative conveniences and inconveniences of the parties, considering the difficulty and additional financial burden on the petitioner wife.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought transfer of a matrimonial case from the court of learned District Judge, North Lakhimpur to the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati, citing difficulty and financial burden due to travel and lack of support from her husband.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that it would be difficult for the petitioner wife to contest the matrimonial case at the court of learned District Judge, North Lakhimpur and it would impose additional financial burden on her, thus allowing the transfer petition.

Issues: Transfer of matrimonial case from one court to another based on comparative conveniences and inconveniences of the parties.

Ratio Decidendi: In a matrimonial transfer petition, the court considers the comparative conveniences and inconveniences of the parties, irrespective of whether it is the husband or wife, and allows the transfer if it deems fit based on the materials available on record and pleadings made by the parties.

Final Decision: The transfer petition is allowed, and the case pending in the court of the learned District Judge, North Lakhimpur is transferred to the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati.

ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. K. K. Handique, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. U S Borgohain, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. The present application is filed under section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for transfer of the T.S (D) Case No.112/2022, pending before the court of learned District Judge, North Lakhimpur to the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati.

3. The case of the petitioner is that she got married with the respondent on 27.04.2014 as per Hindu customary rituals and commenced conjugal life and out of their wedlock, a female child was born on 29.04.2015. The marital life of the petitioner could not run well and smoothly and both the petitioner and the respondent started living separately. In the meantime, the respondent filed a Title Suit (D) No.112/2022 under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the learned District Judge, North Lakhimpur praying for dissolution of marriage.

4. The petitioner claims that she has no source of income and depends on her elder sister for livelihood. The petitioner has also preferred an application under section 125 Cr.P.C., before the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kamrup (M), seeking maintenance from her husband. In this proceeding husband appeared and now it is pending for disposal.

5. The present petitioner submitted that it will be difficult on her part and inconvenient to travel from Palashbari, Guwahati to attend the Court of learned District Judge, at North Lakhimpur. The petitioner further contends that as the husband is not supporting her financially, she will be burdened with unnecessary expense.

6. This court has given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties.

7. By now it is well settled that in a matrimonial transfer petition, for the purpose of transfer, basically it is seen the comparative conveniences and inconveniences of the parties irrespective of whether it is husband or wife. There is no dispute that both the learned District Judge, North Lakhimpur as well as learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kamrup (M) are having jurisdiction to entertain the suit in question. Therefore, this Court is to consider on the basis of materials available on record and pleadings made by the parties whether this is a fit case to be transferred as prayed by the petitioner wife.

8. Considering the submissions advanced and the pleadings made in the petition, this Court is of the view that it will be difficult on the part of the petitioner wife to contest the matrimonial case at the court of learned District Judge, North Lakhimpur and it will have additional financial burden on her. Accordingly, taking note of the matter in entirety, the present petition is allowed by transferring the case pending in the court of the learned District Judge, North Lakhimpur to the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati.

9. The court of the learned District Judge, North Lakhimpur shall transmit the record to the court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati.

10. The parties shall appear before the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kamrup (M) on 23.06.2023.

11. Registry to communicate this order to the court of learned District Judge, North Lakhimpur as well as the court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kamrup (M), at Guwahati.

12. With the aforesaid, the transfer petition stands allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top