SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 1399

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Lohori Das - Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam And Others - Respondents
WP(C) No.6284 Of 2021
Decided On : 29-04-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : B. Ahmed.

The TET qualification acquired prior to the recruitment process met the eligibility criteria, and the corrigendum clarified the age relaxation, warranting the consideration of the petitioner's appointment based on merit within 45 days.

Headnote:

TET Qualification - Age Relaxation - Office Memorandum No. ABP.6/2016/51 dated 02.09.2020, Corrigendum No. ABP.6/2016/52 dated 20.02.2021 - The court held that the TET qualification acquired by the petitioner, prior to the recruitment process, has to be construed to be meeting the eligibility criteria. The rejection of the petitioner in the recruitment process is set aside, and the case of the petitioner for appointment as a Graduate Teacher as per the advertisement dated 11.09.2020 shall be duly considered based upon her position in the merit list and be offered expeditiously within an outer limit of 45 days from the date of the judgment.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the final select list for Graduate Teachers (Arts) in Cachar District, claiming age relaxation for Schedule Caste category and seeking appointment based on higher marks obtained in the TET examination. The respondent authorities rejected the petitioner's candidature based on age limit criteria and issuance of appointment letters before the corrigendum omitting the age limit clause.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's TET qualification acquired prior to the recruitment process met the eligibility criteria, and the rejection based on age limit was unreasonable. The corrigendum clarified the age relaxation, and the rejection was set aside, directing the consideration of the petitioner's appointment based on merit within 45 days.

Issues: The issues involved the petitioner's eligibility for appointment as a Graduate Teacher, the application of age relaxation, and the rejection based on age limit criteria.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the TET qualification acquired prior to the recruitment process met the eligibility criteria, and the corrigendum clarified the age relaxation, warranting the consideration of the petitioner's appointment based on merit within 45 days.

Final Decision: The rejection of the petitioner in the recruitment process was set aside, and the case for appointment as a Graduate Teacher was directed to be considered based on merit within an outer limit of 45 days from the date of the judgment.

JUDGMENT :

(Devashis Baruah, J.) –

1. Heard Mr. N. Haque, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R. Mazumdar, the learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education Department appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4 & 5. Also heard Ms. D.D. Barman, the learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent No. 2.

2. The petitioner herein has filed the instant writ petition for setting aside and quashing the final select list, Secondary Education, pursuant to the advertisement No. GD-EST/Advertisement/1/2020/11 for Graduate Teacher (Arts) of Cachar District so far as it relates to Schedule Caste category which has already been published by the respondent authorities as well as for a direction that the respondents, particularly the respondent No. 5 to publish a fresh correct final select list of Graduate Teachers (Arts) in Cachar District under Schedule Caste category and appoint the petitioner by including her name on the basis of her securing higher marks than the selected one.

3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner had completed her B.A. degree in Arts in the year 1999, M.A. (Bengali) in the year 2001 and also obtained B.Ed. degree in the year 2003 from the Assam University, Silchar. Being from the Schedule Caste category, the petitioner claims to be entitled to relaxation of age provided under the Constitution of India. The TET Empowered Committee for Secondary Education, Assam issued an advertisement No. RMSA/Special/TET/842/2017/80 dated 31.07.2017 for conducting special TET of High School Level Teachers stating the upper age limit not above 43 years as on 01.01.2017 for Graduate Teachers. It was provided that there would be relaxation of upper age limit for SC, ST(P), ST(H) for another 5 years as per the Government of Assam's Office Memorandum No. ABP.06/2016/04, dated 03.03.2016. The petitioner submitted her application through online TET (Teacher Eligibility Test), 2017 bearing application No. 17535190 (Bengali Medium). While the petitioner was waiting for the response to her application submitted in terms with the advertisement dated 31.07.2017, the Member Secretary, TET Empowered Committee for Secondary Education, Assam had issued another advertisement vide No. RMSA/Special/TET/842/2017/172 dated 13.11.2019 inviting applications from intending candidates for Graduate Teachers in Secondary Education, Assam for appearing in the Teacher Eligibility Test, medium-wise for Secondary Level in pursuance of earlier advertisement dated 31.07.2017. On the date of the advertisement, i.e. on 13.11.2019, a public notice was also issued by the Member Secretary, TET Empowered Committee, Secondary Education, Assam stating that the Medium TET for Secondary Level will be held on 02.12.2019.

4. The petitioner again applied/uploaded her application through online pursuant to the advertisement dated 13.11.2019 and her Application Number was 17535190 (Bengali Medium). The respondent authorities had conducted TET for Graduate Teachers on 19.01.2020 and the petitioner was allotted an Admit Card bearing Roll No. 924010471 as well as Application No. 17535190. Having appeared in the said TET, the petitioner successfully qualified in the TET for Graduate Teacher (Arts). The petitioner was issued a Mark Sheet-cum-Certificate on 23.07.2020 whereby it was shown that the petitioner secured 114 marks out of 200 marks.

5. Thereafter the Government of Assam, Personnel (B) Department had issued an Office Memorandum No. ABP.6/2016/51 dated 02.09.2020 by which the upper age limit was raised for entry into the State Government Services from 38 years to 40 years for Grade-III and Grade-IV posts. The Government had also decided to further raise the upper age limit by 5 years for general age limit, i.e. up to 45 years from existing 43 years for entry into the State Government Services in respect of candidates who belong to the Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe and by 3 years, i.e. up to 43 years in respect to OBC/MOBC c

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top