RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Basiran Bewa – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Present revision petition is preferred against the impugned order dated 30.10.2021, passed in Sessions Case No. 128/2018, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge has rejected the prayer of the petitioner to invoke the Section 319 CrPC to summon the 7 (seven) nos. of persons as additional accused to face the trial.
2. I have heard Mr HRA Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr A Roshid, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr M K Hussain, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 to 8, and the learned counsel for the State respondent No. 1.
3. The petitioner, herein, as an informant lodged an FIR dated 04.05.2014, against 24 nos. of accused persons and others named in the FIR, alleging that they trespassed into the house of the informant with weapons in their hands and tried to kill the petitioner to which she escaped and thereafter, the FIR-named accused persons looted away cash amount of Rs. 50,000, gold ornaments and also burnt down her house by pouring kerosene oil. On the facts, Matia PS Case No. 65/2014 under Section 120(B)/147/148/448/384/436/427/506 IPC was registered and after completion of the investigation, charge sheet was laid on 12.
Brijendra Singh & Others -Vs- State of Rajasthan; (2017) 7 SCC 706 (Crl. Appeal No. 763/2017)
Hardip Singh -Vs- State of Punjab; (2014) 3 SCC 92
Labhuji Amratji Thakor & Others -Vs- State of Gujarat; (2019) 12 SCC 644 (Crl. Appeal No. 1349/2018)
Md Isphani -Vs- Jogendra Chandak; (2017) 16 SCC 226
Rajesh -Vs- State of Haryana; (2019) 6 SCC 368
Sartaj Singh -Vs- State of Haryana; 2021 (4) Scale 227
Shiv Prakash Mishra -Vs- State of Uttar Pradesh; (2019) 7 SCC 806 (Crl. Appeal No. 1105/2018)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.