Back
SUMAN SHYAM
Sri Balaji Cement Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India Rep. By The Secy. To The Govt. Of India Ministry Of Commerce And Industries Deptt. Of Industrial Policy And Promotion Udyog Bhawan New Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Dr. A. Todi, learned counsel for the writ petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Gogoi, learned CGC, appearing for the respondent no. 1, Mr. A. Kalita, learned Standing Counsel, Industries and Commerce Department, Government of Assam, representing the respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4 and Mr. G. Das, learned Standing Counsel, NEDFI, appearing for the respondent no. 5.
2. The writ petitioner herein is a company registered under the Companies Act and is engaged in the business of cement manufacturing through its industrial unit set up at Jorhat in the district of Jorhat, Assam. Being aggrieved by the rejection of its claim for releasing transport subsidy by the “Pre Audit” Team of the Principal Accounts Office of the Chief Controller of Accounts attached to the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) on the ground that the claim was ‘time-barred’, the instant writ petition has been filed with a prayer to set aside the rejection letter dated 12/07/2010 and also for issuance of a direction to sanction the transport subsidy amounting to Rs. 21,01,715/-for the period from 01/10/2002 to 31/12/2002 along with interest @ 24% per annum from the date of submission of the claim ti
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the rejection of a claim for transport subsidy cannot be solely based on the ground of being time-barred, especially when the scheme itself do....
Claims for transport subsidy under the Transport Subsidy Scheme, 1971 should be processed without undue delay, and rejections based on administrative lapses are not permissible.
Late filing of a writ petition regarding previously settled claims prohibits reconsideration, reaffirming the principle of finality in administrative decisions.
The court upheld the principles of promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation, ruling that the government must honor its prior subsidy commitments under the Transport Subsidy Scheme despite cance....
When a period of time is prescribed "from" a specific date, the starting date is excluded from the computation. Consequently, an act performed on the anniversary of that starting date falls within th....
The doctrine of promissory estoppel does not apply when a government policy is modified in public interest, and entitlement to subsidies is contingent upon meeting specific conditions within the poli....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
