Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH
Pp Plastic And Industries Pvt Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India Rep. By The Secretary To The Govt. Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and procedural history of the industrial subsidy claim dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. interpretation of statutory limitation excluding the first day of computation. (Para 6 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. respondents' contention regarding the limitation period for filing subsidy applications. (Para 9) |
| 4. timely submission of claims and mandatory processing by respondent authorities. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT :
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Heard Mr. D. Sahu, the learned counsel appearing on behalf ofthe petitioner. Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, the learned Senior Counsel as well as the learned Dy.SGI assisted by Ms. N. Devi, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No. 1 and Mr. M. Chetia, the learned Government Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent Nos. 2 to 6.
2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the action on the part of the respondents in rejecting the petitioner’s claim under the Central Capital Investment Subsidy Scheme, 2007 to which the petitioner claims entitlement.
3. The brief facts which led to the filing of the instant writ petition are that the Government of India had notified the North East
When a period of time is prescribed "from" a specific date, the starting date is excluded from the computation. Consequently, an act performed on the anniversary of that starting date falls within th....
Strict interpretation of subsidy schemes and the burden of proving eligibility lies with the petitioner.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's claim for Capital Investment Subsidy as the application was filed after the stipulated peri....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the fulfillment of conditions is essential for receiving government subsidies, and the doctrine of promissory estoppel may not apply if the co....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity for determining the real questions in controversy between the parties and the consideration of prejudice or injustice to the other pa....
Claims for transport subsidy under the Transport Subsidy Scheme, 1971 should be processed without undue delay, and rejections based on administrative lapses are not permissible.
The court confirmed that electrical installations essential for plant operations qualify for subsidy under the CCISS, rejecting previous misconceptions about their eligibility.
The central legal principle established is that government authorities must fulfill their obligations to provide promised incentives and establish clear mechanisms for disbursement, ensuring that ben....
Applications for subsidy under the Central Investment Scheme must be considered if submitted before the cut-off date and compliant with requirements.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
