IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
Sanowar Hussain Mondal, S/o. Ajmat Ali - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam, Rep. By The PP, Govt. Of Assam And Anr. – Respondents
Tr.P.(Crl.) No.25 Of 2023
Decided On : 16-11-2023
Transfer of Case - Criminal Procedure Code - Section 407 - Fair and Impartial Inquiry - Section 407 of the Cr.P.C. - Mrs. Maneka Sanjay Gandhi and Anr. v. Ms. Rani Jethmalani (1979 (4) SCC 167)
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to transfer a case pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, North Salmora, Abhayapuri, District -Bongaigaon to the Court of learned CJM, Kamrup (M) Guwahati, citing difficulty in appearing before the court at Abhayapuri and apprehension of threat to his life from the family members of the respondent No.2.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the grounds for transfer were not justified as the petitioner had not informed about his apprehension to the court or the police. It also considered the respondent No.2's status as a poor lady taking shelter in her parental abode with minor children, making it impossible for her to appear before the court at Guwahati.
Issues: The main issue was whether the case should be transferred from the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Abhayapuri to the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup (M) Guwahati based on the petitioner's grounds of difficulty in appearing before the court at Abhayapuri and apprehension of threat to his life.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principle that the petitioner, being the accused, cannot dictate where the case against him should be tried. It also emphasized the necessity to ensure fair trial and considered the convenience of the parties, especially the respondent No.2, who has the right to choose any court having jurisdiction.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, finding no merit in the grounds for transfer, and left the parties to bear their own costs.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. C.K. Baruah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, learned Addl. P.P., Assam, appearing for the State/respondent No.1, and Mr. A. Roshid, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2.
2. This application, under Section 407 of the Cr.P.C. is preferred by Sanowar Hussain Mondal, for transferring of PRC Case No.431/2020, under Section 498(A) IPC, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, North Salmora, Abhayapuri, District -Bongaigaon to the Court of learned CJM, Kamrup (M) Guwahati.
3. The factual background leading to filing of the present petition is briefly stated as under:
Upon the said FIR the Officer-In-Charge has registered a case, being Abhayapuri P.S. Case No. 603/2019, and endorsed ASI Rakhal Sutradhar to investigate the same. The investigation culminated in submission of charge sheet against Sanowar Hussain to stand trial in the court under section 498(A)/494/506/34 IPC. Upon the said charge sheet the leaned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, North Salmora, Abhayapuri, had taken cognizance and issued process to him and one of his friends had received the same on his behalf and informed him about the same. He then went there and had appeared before the learned court below. And that the family members of respondent No.2, threatened to cause harm to him and to kill him on his way to Abhayapuri Station from the court premises, and while returning, he apprehended that some unknown persons follows him, which frightened him and that his life is in danger. Therefore, he approached this court for transferring the PRC case No. 431/2020, arising out of Abhayapuri P.S. Case No. 603/2019, from the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, North Salmora, Abhayapuri, to the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup (M), Guwahati or to any of court of the neighboring district.”
4. Mr. C.K. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has approached the court to transfer the PRC case No. 431/2020, arising out of Abhayapuri P.S. Case No. 603/2019, from the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Abhayapuri to the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup (M), Guwahati, or to any other competent court of neighbouring district, on the following two grounds:-
(ii) That, there is apprehension of life of the petitioner, if he used to attend the court at Abhayapuri from Guwahati as the family members of respondent No.2 threatened to cause harm to him and to kill him on his way to Abhayapuri Station from the court premises.
5. Whereas, Mr. A. Rashid, learned counsel for the res
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the accused cannot dictate where the case against him should be tried, and the necessity to ensure fair trial and consider the convenience ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of a reasonable apprehension for transfer under Section 407 of the CrPC, as emphasized by relevant case law.
Point of Law : Only when fair justice is in peril, a plea for transfer might be considered.
Transfer of criminal cases under Section 407 Cr.P.C. requires substantial grounds beyond mere convenience or apprehension; the applicant must demonstrate a reasonable basis for fearing an unfair tria....
Point of Law : An order of transfer is not to be passed as a matter of routine or merely because an interested party has expressed some apprehension about proper conduct of the trial. The power has t....
Transfer of criminal cases requires exceptional circumstances; mere apprehension of injustice is insufficient.
The convenience and inconvenience of the parties must be considered in transfer petitions, and the current residence and filing of cases in a particular jurisdiction can influence the decision to tra....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.