SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Gau) 1276

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
Sanowar Hussain Mondal, S/o. Ajmat Ali - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam, Rep. By The PP, Govt. Of Assam And Anr. – Respondents
Tr.P.(Crl.) No.25 Of 2023
Decided On : 16-11-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Dey.

The central legal point established in the judgment is that the accused cannot dictate where the case against him should be tried, and the necessity to ensure fair trial and consider the convenience of the parties.

Headnote:

Transfer of Case - Criminal Procedure Code - Section 407 - Fair and Impartial Inquiry - Section 407 of the Cr.P.C. - Mrs. Maneka Sanjay Gandhi and Anr. v. Ms. Rani Jethmalani (1979 (4) SCC 167)

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to transfer a case pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, North Salmora, Abhayapuri, District -Bongaigaon to the Court of learned CJM, Kamrup (M) Guwahati, citing difficulty in appearing before the court at Abhayapuri and apprehension of threat to his life from the family members of the respondent No.2.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the grounds for transfer were not justified as the petitioner had not informed about his apprehension to the court or the police. It also considered the respondent No.2's status as a poor lady taking shelter in her parental abode with minor children, making it impossible for her to appear before the court at Guwahati.

Issues: The main issue was whether the case should be transferred from the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Abhayapuri to the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup (M) Guwahati based on the petitioner's grounds of difficulty in appearing before the court at Abhayapuri and apprehension of threat to his life.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principle that the petitioner, being the accused, cannot dictate where the case against him should be tried. It also emphasized the necessity to ensure fair trial and considered the convenience of the parties, especially the respondent No.2, who has the right to choose any court having jurisdiction.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, finding no merit in the grounds for transfer, and left the parties to bear their own costs.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. C.K. Baruah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, learned Addl. P.P., Assam, appearing for the State/respondent No.1, and Mr. A. Roshid, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2.

2. This application, under Section 407 of the Cr.P.C. is preferred by Sanowar Hussain Mondal, for transferring of PRC Case No.431/2020, under Section 498(A) IPC, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, North Salmora, Abhayapuri, District -Bongaigaon to the Court of learned CJM, Kamrup (M) Guwahati.

3. The factual background leading to filing of the present petition is briefly stated as under:

    “The respondent No.2 -Smti. Jelima Khatun has lodged an FIR with the Borghola Police Out Post on 12.09.2019, alleging inter-alia amongst others that she got married with Sanowar Hussain as per Muslim law and thereafter lived together as husband and wife in his house, and thereafter Sanowar Hussain subjected her to both physical and mental torture. Thereafter, on 23.07.2019, as per instruction of his family members, namely Ajmot Ali, Anowara Khatun and Noor Alom, he again married another woman, namely, Moyna Khatoon from Satgaon, Guwahati and thereafter, Sanowar Hussain had demanded money from her and assaulted her and driven her out of the matrimonial home. And since then she has been taking shelter in her parental abode and she has also been carrying pregnancy of three months. Thereafter, on 05.09.2019, at about 7 pm, Ajmot Ali and Anowara Khatun had tried to administer Kabiraji medicine to her, with a view to kill her and to cause miscarriage of her pregnancy. When she raised alarm they fled away, and thereafter, on 07.09.2019, Sanowar Hussain and Noor Alam attempted to kidnap her four years old child, but they could not succeed.

Upon the said FIR the Officer-In-Charge has registered a case, being Abhayapuri P.S. Case No. 603/2019, and endorsed ASI Rakhal Sutradhar to investigate the same. The investigation culminated in submission of charge sheet against Sanowar Hussain to stand trial in the court under section 498(A)/494/506/34 IPC. Upon the said charge sheet the leaned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, North Salmora, Abhayapuri, had taken cognizance and issued process to him and one of his friends had received the same on his behalf and informed him about the same. He then went there and had appeared before the learned court below. And that the family members of respondent No.2, threatened to cause harm to him and to kill him on his way to Abhayapuri Station from the court premises, and while returning, he apprehended that some unknown persons follows him, which frightened him and that his life is in danger. Therefore, he approached this court for transferring the PRC case No. 431/2020, arising out of Abhayapuri P.S. Case No. 603/2019, from the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, North Salmora, Abhayapuri, to the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup (M), Guwahati or to any of court of the neighboring district.”

4. Mr. C.K. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has approached the court to transfer the PRC case No. 431/2020, arising out of Abhayapuri P.S. Case No. 603/2019, from the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Abhayapuri to the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup (M), Guwahati, or to any other competent court of neighbouring district, on the following two grounds:-

    (i) That, though the petitioner hails from Village-Ambari, under Abhayapuri P.S., yet, he resides at Guwahati because of his avocation and on such counts it is difficult for him to appear before the learned court at Abhayapuri;

(ii) That, there is apprehension of life of the petitioner, if he used to attend the court at Abhayapuri from Guwahati as the family members of respondent No.2 threatened to cause harm to him and to kill him on his way to Abhayapuri Station from the court premises.

5. Whereas, Mr. A. Rashid, learned counsel for the res

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top