MOHD. AZHAR HUSAIN IDRISI
Sonam Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
[Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi, J.]
1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. As per office report dated 17.02.2023/4.3.2023, notice issued by this Court vide order dated 12.1.2023 has been served upon opposite party nos. 2 to 6 but despite service of notice, no one has appeared on their behalf. Therefore, the Court is proceeding to decide the case on merits.
3. The present transfer application has been moved under Section 407 Cr.P.C. against the opposite party nos. 2 to 6 with prayer to transfer the entire proceedings of Case No. 2554 of 2019 (Sonam Rai Vs. Rakesh Rai & others), under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 120-B IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Tahabarpur, District Azamgarh, pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh to the court of competent jurisdiction at District Mau.
4. Succinctly, the applicant's case is that applicant has filed a complaint on 27.8.2019 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 120B IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act against the opposite party nos. 2 to 6 for summoning them.
5. Since 27.8.2019 the police has not submitted any report and inspite of the statement u
Gurcharan Dass Chadha Vs. State of Rajasthan AIR 1966 SC 1418
Vijay Pal and others Vs. State of Haryana and another
Anjali Ashok Sadhwani Vs. Ashok Kishinchand Sadhwani
Fatema Vs. Jafri Syed Husain @ Syed Parvez Jafferi
Maneka Sanjay Gandhi Vs. Rani Jethmalani (1979) 4 SCC 167
Abdul Nazar Madani Vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2000) 6 SCC 204
K.P. Tiwari Vs. State of M.P. 1994 SCC (Cri) 712
K. Anbazhagan Vs. Superintendent of Police (2004) 3 SCC 767
Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh Vs. State of Gujarat (2004) 4 SCC 158
Captain Amarinder Singh Vs. Parkash Singh Badal and others (2009) 6 SCC 260
Lalu Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand (2013) 8 SCC 593
Amit Agarwal Vs. Atul Gupta 2014 (11) ADJ 414 (All.)
Usmangani Adambhai Vahora Vs. State of Gujarat and another (2016) 3 SCC 370
Rajkot Cancer Society vs. Municipal Corporation, Rajkot
Point of Law : An order of transfer is not to be passed as a matter of routine or merely because an interested party has expressed some apprehension about proper conduct of the trial. The power has t....
Point of Law : An order of transfer is not to be passed as a matter of routine or merely because an interested party has expressed some apprehension about proper conduct of the trial. The power has t....
The court established that a mere allegation of bias or apprehension of injustice is insufficient for transferring a case; there must be reasonable and substantiated grounds for such a request.
Transfer of trial under Section 407 of Cr.P.C. requires substantiation of reasonable apprehension of unfair trial, considering the convenience of all parties involved.
Transfer of criminal cases under Section 407 Cr.P.C. requires substantial grounds beyond mere convenience or apprehension; the applicant must demonstrate a reasonable basis for fearing an unfair tria....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of a reasonable apprehension for transfer under Section 407 of the CrPC, as emphasized by relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.