SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 53

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Smti. Bina Mirdha And Anr. – Appellants
Versus
The State Of Assam And Ors – Respondents
WP(C) 3689 of 2015
Decided on : 30-01-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. M.A. Sheikh, Advocate
For the respondent:Mr. B.J. Talukdar, Mr. R. Borpujari, Advocate

The entitlement for land allotment and settlement under the Assam Fixation of Ceiling on Land Holding Act, 1956 is subject to the provisions of the Act, the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886, and the Land Policy of Assam, 2019. Verification of occupation is crucial before considering grant of settlement/allotment.

Headnote:

Land Allotment - Land Dispute - Assam Fixation of Ceiling on Land Holding Act, 1956 - Section 16, Section 17, Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886 - Land Policy of Assam, 2019

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought land allotment and settlement by issuance of permanent Patta in their favor for a plot of land acquired under the Assam Fixation of Ceiling on Land Holding Act, 1956. The land was proposed to be allotted to the petitioners' father, but no final allotment was made. The respondent authorities claimed that the petitioners were not in possession of the land and that allotment had been made to others.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the communication dated 21.05.1980 only evidenced a proposal for granting settlement to the petitioners' father, but no actual allotment was made in their favor. The court analyzed the provisions of the Act of 1956, the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886, and the Land Policy of Assam, 2019 to determine the entitlement for land allotment. The court directed the District Commissioner to verify if the petitioners were in occupation of the land and, if so, to consider them for grant of settlement/allotment within six months.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to land allotment and settlement under the Act of 1956, considering the proposal for allotment and the actual possession of the land.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the provisions of the Act of 1956, particularly Sections 16 and 17, and the Land Policy of Assam, 2019 to determine the entitlement for land allotment. It emphasized the need for verification of the petitioners' occupation of the land before considering them for grant of settlement/allotment.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition by directing the District Commissioner to verify the petitioners' occupation of the land and, if found in occupation, to consider them for grant of settlement/allotment within six months.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. M. A. Sheikh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Also heard Mr. R. Borpujari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1 and Mr. B.J. Talukdar, learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4.

2. The petitioners herein, being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities to allot the land and grant settlement by issuance of permanent Patta in their favour, have filed the instant writ petition. The facts as would appear from the pleadings, are that the petitioners’ grandfather one Late Lakswan Mirdha was working as a workman at the Jalalpur Tea Estate in the district of Cachar. It has been mentioned in the writ petition that the said tea garden authorities had granted settlement of the plot of land in question to the grandfather of the petitioners and the grandfather of the petitioners had possessed and utilised the said land during his life time. It is also mentioned that after the death of the petitioners’ grandfather, the father of the petitioners, Late Sanatan Mirdha @ Suna Mirdha was possessing and utilising the said land.

3. A plot of land comprising of 9 Bighas 1 Katha, 3 Chatak located in Mouza Baleswar Grant, Porgana Jalalpur, bearing Dag No. 256 of 2nd R.S. was acquired by the Government in terms with the provisions of the Assam Fixation of Ceiling on Land Holding Act, 1956 (for short, “Act of 1956”), as the same was ceiling surplus land. The father of the petitioners, who was in possession of the land applied for allotment of the land. It is mentioned in the writ petition that the father of the petitioners came to learn that there was a proposal to allot some land to the father of the petitioners along with others. It is seen from the pleadings of the petitioners that specific emphasis has been made to a communication dated 21.05.1980 (Annexure-4 to the writ petition), issued by the Sub-Deputy Collector, Katigorah, to the Deputy Commissioner, Cachar, Silchar. The said communication was issued in connection to a petition filed by one Shri Alok Ahmed Laskar and 117 others praying for public road from Biswamberpur to Kushiarkul via Baleswargrant over ceiling surplus land. This Court finds it very pertinent to take note of the contents of the said communication taking into account that the entire case of the petitioners rests on the said communication. From a perusal of the communication dated 21.05.1980, it reveals that various persons had applied for allotment of land pursuant to the acquisition of the ceiling surplus land of the said tea estate under the Act of 1956. At the request of the local people, it was decided that 1 Bigha 1 Katha 13 Chatak of land from Dag Nos. 224, 254 and 256 of Mouza Baleswargrant was required for construction of the road. It was also mentioned that amongst the various persons, the petitioners’ father was also proposed to be allotted 2 Bighas of land. However, the allotment certificate was not prepared and distributed and the final possession was not handed over to the proposed allottees. It further reveals from the chart, which was a part of the said communication dated 21.05.1980 that the father of the petitioners was proposed to be allotted 2 Bighas of land and, out which 5 Katha 13 Chatak of land was to be excluded for the purpose of construction of the road and allotment could be given in respect of 1 Bigha 14 Katha 3 Chatak of land. It is the case of the petitioners that other persons have been granted settlement except the father of the petitioners and, as such, the present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to issue permanent Patta in favour of the petitioners.

4. The record reveals that the Assistant Settlement Officer, Katigorah Revenue Circle had filed an affidavit-in-opposition on 19.02.2016 stating inter alia that land measuring 9 Bighas 1 Katha 3 Chatak under 2nd R.S. Dag No. 256 of Mauza Baleswarpar Grant, Pargana Jalalpur was made cei

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top