JUDGMENT :

DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.

1. Heard Mr. A.R. Bhuyan, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. Nath, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioner herein has assailed the termination of his agency and forfeiture of his commission and thereby had challenged the various orders including the order dated 25.03.2015.

3. From the materials on record, it reveals that the petitioner herein was issued an agency licence in the year 1997. During the course of time, the petitioner claimed to have obtained various policies and rendered business to the respondent Corporation. The dispute arises on account of an insurance policy being made of one Bhabani Kalita (since deceased). The record reveals that one Bhabani Kalita had approached the petitioner for a policy amounting to Rs.50,000/-. As a proof of his age, Late Bhabani Kalita produced the age certificate from the Head Master, Hekra High School wherein it was certified that the said Late Bhabani Kalita was 12 years as on 31.12.1958. On the basis of the said certificate, the petitioner submitted the proposal stating inter-alia that he knew Late Bhabani Kalita “since long.” Consequently, on the basis of t