MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
Ruhul Amin, S/o Md. Main Uddin – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam Represented By The Principal Secretary To The Govt. Of Assam, Panchayat And Rural Development Department – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. D.A. Kaiyum, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, P&RD Department.
2. The petitioner’s case is that the petitioner took part in the tender process for settlement of the Balisatra Bi-Weekly Market for the year 2021-22 vide NIT dated 10.05.2021. The highest bidder withdrew his tender. The petitioner, who was the second highest bidder, was issued a letter dated 26.07.2021, directing him to submit the remaining documents in terms of Clause 10 of the tender notice within 3 days, as he had not submitted the required documents along with his quotation, in terms of Clause 10 of the NIT. Thus, the petitioner was to submit his documents (except Court fee and earnest money) within 3(three) days, as the market was to be settled with the petitioner in terms of Clause 10 of the NIT.
3. Clause 7 and Clause 10 of the NIT are re-produced hereinbelow as follows :
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.