SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 135

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Nabanita Das, Wife Of Sri Shailen Kalita and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The Union Of India, Represented By The Secretary To The Ministry Of Petroleum And Natural Gas and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.378 Of 2024
Decided On : 24-01-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. D. P. Borah, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. M. K. Choudhury, Sr. Adv., Mr. P. Bharadwaj, Standing Counsel.

The deference to the understanding and appreciation of tender documents by the tendering authority unless there is malafide or perversity.

Headnote:

Tender - Challenge to Clause 14 of tender schedule - [Indian Oil Corporation Act, Section 14] - The court considered the challenge to Clause 14 of the tender schedule, which stipulated the maximum age of quoted trucks and eligibility for participation based on the date of registration. The court referred to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Afcons Infrastructure Limited and Galaxy Transport Agencies cases, emphasizing the deference to the understanding and appreciation of tender documents by the tendering authority unless there is malafide or perversity. The court found no reason to interfere with the clause, considering the necessity and wisdom of the authorities in formulating the condition.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged the Notice Inviting e-Tender issued by the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. for transportation of Indane LPG cylinders, specifically Clause 14 of the tender schedule, which stipulated the maximum age of quoted trucks and eligibility for participation based on the date of registration.

Finding of the Court:

The court found no reason to interfere with Clause 14 of the tender schedule, considering the necessity and wisdom of the authorities in formulating the condition. The petition was dismissed.

Issues: Challenge to Clause 14 of the tender schedule, interpretation of tender documents, and authority's discretion in setting tender conditions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the deference to the understanding and appreciation of tender documents by the tendering authority unless there is malafide or perversity. It found no reason to interfere with the clause, considering the necessity and wisdom of the authorities in formulating the condition.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the instant writ petition, reserving the right of the authorities to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. D. P. Borah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and Mr. M. K. Chodhury, the learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. P. Bharadwaj, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. None appears on behalf of the Respondent No.1 on call.

2. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioners challenging the Notice Inviting e-Tender issued by the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. for transportation of Indane LPG cylinders in vertical position on unit rate basis Ex-North Guwahati BP on the ground that Clause 14 of the tender schedule of the Notice Inviting Tender stipulates that if the last date of bid submission is extended after publication of the tender, vehicles having date of registration up to the last date of bid submission (as per original tender document) shall only be eligible for participation.

3. From the materials on record, it reveals that the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. had issued the said Notice Inviting E-Tender in Two Bid System (Part A : Technical Bid with Commercial Terms and Part B : Price Bid) from company, partnership/proprietorship firm, Co-operative Society meeting the minimum PQC (pre-qualification criteria) for award of contract for Transportation of Indane LPG Cylinders in vertical position on unit rate basis, Ex-North Guwahati Bottling Plant for a period of three years initially with a provision of two yearly extension of one year each at the same rate, terms and conditions at sole discretion of the Indian Oil Corporation.

4. It is relevant to take note of that the tender in question was published on 24.11.2023. The bid submission start date was 22.12.2023 and the last date of submission of the bid was 01.01.2024. It was also mentioned that the bid opening date was on 03.01.2024. The record further reveals that a corrigendum was issued for extension of the critical dates as per the e-Tender on 21.12.2023 whereby the bid submission date was extended to 20.01.2024 and the bid submission last date was also extended to 31.01.2024. Further to that, the bid opening date was fixed on 02.02.2024. The Petitioners herein are aggrieved with Clause 14 of the tender schedule which stipulates the maximum age of the quoted trucks. The said Clause 14 is quoted hereinbelow:

14

Maximum Age of quoted trucks

The maximum age of any quoted truck (as reckoned from the month & year of manufacturing mentioned in RTO Registration) should not exceed 14 years (concerned State office to change in case local laws of the particular location/State prescribes age/model limit even less than 14 years) as on the closing date of this tender.

If last date of bid submission is extended after publication of tender, vehicles having date of registration up to last date of bid submission (as per original tender document) shall only be eligible for participation.

5. From a perusal of the said quoted clause, it reveals that the maximum age of any quoted truck (as reckoned from the month and year of manufacturing mentioned in RTO Registration) should not exceed 14 years as on the closing date of the said tender. It was also mentioned that the concerned State Office to change in case local laws of a particular location/State prescribes age/model limit even less than 14 years. Further to that, it was made clear that if the last date of the bid submission is extended after the publication of tender, vehicles having the date of registration up to the last date of bid submission (as per the original tender document), that would be 01.01.2024 shall only be eligible for participation. It is the case of the Petitioners herein that they have booked various vehicles on 11.01.2024 and those vehicles are likely to be delivered to the Petitioners within 15 days as stated by the commercial vehicle dealer of TATA Motors in question and as such, the vehicles having the date of registration up to the last date of bid submission on 01.01.2024 deprives the Petitioners

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top