IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KALYAN RAI SURANA, MALASRI NANDI, JJ.
Sri Budheswar Hazarika S/o Late Sison Hazarika – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam And Anr – Respondent
Crl.A(J) 98 of 2022
Decided on : 12-01-2024
POCSO - Conviction under section 6 of the POCSO Act - 383, 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. - 376(2)(i) IPC - 4 of POCSO Act - 26(1), 27(3), 33(4), 20, 23 of POCSO Act - Media trial - Child incestuous abuse - Victim's testimony - Medical evidence
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was convicted for committing an offence under section 6 of the POCSO Act for sexually abusing his minor daughter, resulting in pregnancy and delivery of a dead child. The victim's testimony, medical evidence, and lack of contradiction in her statements were crucial in establishing the offence.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found the victim's testimony credible and reliable, with no evidence of tutoring or false implication. The medical evidence corroborated the victim's account, and the absence of visitors to the house supported the victim's isolation and vulnerability.
Issues: The issues included the reliability of the victim's testimony, compliance with procedural requirements under the POCSO Act, and the impact of media coverage on the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The victim's consistent testimony, lack of contradiction, and corroboration from medical evidence were pivotal in establishing the offence. Non-compliance with procedural requirements did not vitiate the case, and media coverage did not impact the trial.
Final Decision: The Court affirmed the conviction and sentence, dismissing the appeal and upholding the appellant's rigorous imprisonment for life and fine under section 6 of the POCSO Act.
JUDGMENT :
K.R. Surana, J
Heard Ms. S. Sharma, learned legal aid counsel for the appellant. Also heard Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned senior counsel and Addl. P.P. for the State, assisted by Ms. P. Bora, learned counsel, as well as Ms. B.R.A. Sultana, learned legal aid counsel for the informant i.e. respondent no.2.
2. The appellant has filed this appeal from jail as per the provisions of section 383 of the Cr.P.C. By filing this appeal under section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C., the appellant has assailed the judgment dated 09.03.2022, and sentence dated 11.03.2022, passed by the learned Special Judge, POCSO, Golaghat, thereby convicting the appellant for committing offence punishable under section 6 of the POCSO Act. The appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of 3 (three) months for the offence under section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
3. On 29.12.2020, Atulya Krishna Das gad lodged an FIR before the Officer-in-Charge of Golaghat Police Station to the effect that the appellant, his minor daughter and son were living in his rented house since last three years and the women in the neighbourhood upon noticing physical changes in the victim ‘SH’, the 13 (thirteen) year old minor daughter of the appellant asked her what had happened and then she narrated that his father i.e. the appellant had been establishing physical relationship with her and he had threatened her that he would beat her up if she disclosed it to others and so the neighbouring people had come to the rented house of the appellant at 02:30 PM and questioned him and his daughter and at that time also he had threatened to beat up her daughter. Later on, with the help of the locals, the appellant was detailed and the police was informed. Accordingly, Golaghat P.S. Case No. 924/2020, corresponding to G.R. 1613/2020 was registered under sections 376(2)(i) IPC read with section 4 of POCSO Act.
4. After investigation of the case charge-sheet was submitted against the appellant. The learned Trial Court had read over, interpreted and explained the charge framed against the appellant of having committed offence punishable under section 6 of the POCSO Act, to which the appellant had pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
5. In course of trial, the prosecution had examined 11 PWs, namely, Atulya Krishna Das (PW-1), Namita Barua (PW-2), Shewali Hazarika (PW-3), Ruhini Rajbangshi (PW-4), Anamika Das (PW-5), Monowara Begum (PW-6), Shahid Khan (PW-7), Parijat Bora (PW-8), Priyanka Hazarika (PW-9), Dr. Sunita Ekka (PW-10) and Sanjay Sanyal (PW-11) and the following documents were exhibited, viz., ejahar (Ext.1); seizure list (Ext.2); statement of the victim under sec.164 Cr.P.C. (Ext.3); Form-I for Women/victim/survivor Compensation Scheme (Ext.4); medical examination report (Ext.5); clinical pathology report (Ext.6); ultrasonography report (Ext.7); USG copy (Ext.8); sketch map (Ext.9); charge-sheet (Ext.10).
6. Upon completion of examination of PWs, on 02.03.2022, the appellant was examined by the learned Trial Court by placing the incriminating materials appearing against him. The appellant denied the materials appearing against him as false. However, he had declined to adduce any evidence in his defence.
7. The learned Trial Court had framed the following points of determination:
ii. Whether the accused person committed penetrative sexual attack upon the victim, who was 13 years old, more than once?
iii. Whether the victim became pregnant as a result of such sexual intercourse by the accused person?
8. The learned Trial Court had discussed the evidence of the PWs and found the evidence to be reliable and convincing. The learned Trial Court had also discussed the sequence of events relating to the neighboring womenfolk noticing physical changes in the minor
The credibility of the victim's testimony, corroboration from medical evidence, and lack of contradiction were central to establishing the offence under the POCSO Act.
(1) Penetrative sexual assault on girl child – Evidence of approximate age of victim would not be sufficient to any conclusion about exact age of victim.(2) Medical examination of accused of rape is ....
The prosecution failed to establish the elements of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act, leading to the quashing of conviction due to insufficient evidence and unreliable witness testimoni....
The conviction under the POCSO Act requires substantial evidence beyond mere suspicion; failure to prove such evidence necessitates acquittal.
The competence of child witnesses, scrutiny of hostile witnesses' testimony, and the significance of corroborative evidence and the presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act are central legal pri....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on the victim's unshaken testimony, the presumption of guilt under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, and the impact of the amendment to Sec....
The court ruled that the prosecution failed to establish foundational aspects of the alleged sexual assault, leading to the acquittal of the appellant.
The prosecution must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, with sufficient and credible evidence; failure to do so invalidates a conviction.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.