SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 102

ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
Md. Suhail – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : M/s Ajay Kumar Thakur, Vaishnavi Singh, Malay Kumar Choudhary.
For the Respondent: Mr.Syed Ashfaque Ahmad, APP.

Alok Kumar Pandey, J. – The present appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction dated 18.11.2022 and order of sentence dated 23.11.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII cum Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (hereinafter referred to as POCSO), Patna in Special (POCSO) Case No. 178/2017 arising out of Bikram P.S. Case No. 336/2017 whereby the accused (appellant/convict) has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years alongwith fine of Rs.50,000/- (fifty thousand) for the said offence and in default of payment of fine he has to suffer two months additional imprisonment.

2. The name of victim has not been disclosed in the present judgment to protect her prestige and dignity.

3. A written report submitted to S.H.O., Bikram Police Station in the district of Patna under the signature of informant is the basis for registration of First Information Report (hereinafter referred to as FIR).

4. According to written report of informant (PW-2), the occurrence is of 17.11.2017 at about 5.00 P.M. for which information was given on 19.11.2017

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top