SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1778

KALYAN RAI SURANA, MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
State of Nagaland – Appellant
Versus
Neizo Zumu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Govt. Adv.
For the Respondents: Imti Longjem and A. Zho, Adv.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. K.N. Balgopal, learned Advocate General for the State of Nagaland, assisted by Ms. V. Suokhrie, learned Addl. Advocate General. Also heard Mr. Imti Longjem, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 10 and 13 to 17 as well as Mr. A. Zho, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 18 to 23. None appears on call for the respondent nos. 11 and 12 through notice was served on them.

2. By filing this intra-court appeal, the State has assailed the judgment and order dated 19.01.2022, passed by the learned Single Judge of in W.P.(C) No. 126/2021.

3. The said writ petition was filed by the respondent nos. 1 to 17 herein, inter-alia, challenging the appointment of the respondent nos. 18 to 23 herein as the newly constituted Village Council Members (hereinafter referred to as 'VCM' for short) of Botsa Village. The proforma respondent nos. 18 to 23 herein were arrayed as respondent nos. 7 to 12 in the writ petition. The appellants herein were arrayed as respondent nos. 1 to 6 in the writ petition.

4. At the outset, it would be appropriate to have a brief glimpse of the relevant provisions of the Nagaland Village Councils Act, 1978 (formerly, Nagaland Village and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top