SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 101

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MARLI VANKUNG, J.
Smt. Malsawmtluangi, D/o. V.Z. Kapmawia & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Mizoram, Rep. by the Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram, Excise and Narcotics Department, Govt. of Mizoram & Ors. - Respondents
Crl. A. No. 7 of 2023, Crl. A. No. 26 of 2022, I.A.(Crl.) No. 10 of 2023
Decided On : 02-02-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Joseph Lalchhanhima Renthlei.

The court ruled that procedural lapses under the NDPS Act invalidated the conviction, emphasizing that non-compliance with Section 52A merits the benefit of doubt for the accused.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 22(c) - Conviction of two appellants for illegal possession of Methamphetamine based on evidence from a search conducted under lawful means - Compliance with Section 52A not demonstrated, raising credibility issues regarding seizure and sample drawing - Contradictions in witness testimonies lead to doubt on prosecution's claims enabling benefit of doubt to accused. (Paras 30, 33, 41)

(B) Admissibility of statements - Statement of co-accused cannot be used against the appellant in the absence of corroborative evidence. (Paras 53, 56)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were convicted under Section 22(c) NDPS Act after a large quantity of Methamphetamine was seized from a residential search, leading to rigorous imprisonment and fines imposed against them. Main issues included the procedure followed during the search and sample drawing, and adequacy of evidence linking the appellants to the contraband.

Findings of Court:
Trial court's conviction was found inadequate due to lack of proper procedure compliance under NDPS Act, and contradictory statements by witnesses compromised the prosecution's case.

Issues: The primary questions were whether the search and seizure followed statutory requirements and if contradictions among witness testimonies undermined the conviction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined the prosecution failed to prove the appellants' guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to discrepancies in procedures and lack of corroborative evidence to support claims against the appellants.

Result: Appeals allowed; convictions set aside.

Table of Content
1. context and procedural background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. details of the prosecution's evidence. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. witness testimony regarding the seizure process. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. investigation findings and subsequent proceedings. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
5. arguments presented by the appellant's counsel. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
6. counterarguments from the prosecution. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
7. court's observations on evidence and procedure. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
8. final ruling and decision on the appeals. (Para 41 , 42)
9. absence of direct evidence against the appellant necessitates acquittal. (Para 43 , 44)

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. Joseph L. Renthlei, learned counsel for the appellant Smt. Malsawmtluangi in Crl. A. No.7 of 2023 and Mr. C. Lalfakzuala learned counsel for the appellant Sh. Samuel T.T Thanga in Crl. A. No. 27 of 2022, also heard Mrs. Mary L. Khiangte, learned Addl. PP for the state respondent in both the cases. The appellants are assailing their conviction under section 22(c) ND & PS Act arising from a common Judgment and Order dated 11.10.2022 passed by the learned Fast Track Court, Additional Sessions Judge, Kolasib District, in SC(K) No.198 of 2015 Crl. Tr. No.1267/2015 and the sentence order dated 25.10.2022 wherein both the appellants, on their conviction under section 22 ( C ) ND& PS Act were sentenced to undergo Rigorous imprisonment for a term of 10 years each and to pay a fine of Rs.10,00,00/- each, in default to undergo R.I 1( one) year. Since the instant appeals are arising out of a common Judgment & Order, both the appeals are considered together.

2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that, on 29.05.2015, SI K. Lalmawizuala lodged a written FIR stating that information was received from reliable source indicated that there was a huge quantity of contraband drugs suspected to be Methamphetamine at B. SE Thingdawl Village, Kolasib District. Accordingly, the authorized person SI K. Lalmawizuala of Spl. Narcotic PS with Police party accompanied by the Addl. SP CID (Crime) and the Officer in Charge of Spl. Narcotic PS proceeded to Thingdawl Hmar veng on the morning of 29.05.2015 to conduct search operation and intercepted one suspected person Malsawmtluangi (38) D/o V.Z. Kapmawia of Thingdawl Hmar veng at her residence.

3. The search party conducted searching of the residence of the suspected person Malsawmtluangi (38) D/O VZ Kapmawia of Thingdawl Hmar veng, and recovered one black Air-Bag from the bedroom, kept on the floor, hidden near the bed, which contained huge quantity of contraband drugs suspected to be Methamphetamine. On further checking, it was found that the bag contained 9 (nine) identical yellow packages and 1 (one) package covered with black polythene, total 10 (ten) packages. The same were seized on the spot in presence of the above mentioned two local reliable witnesses and prepared seizure memo. The total number of tablets was 58800 weighing 5.586 kgs with an estimated value of Rs.176,46,000/- at local market. Statement of seizure witnesses were recorded on the spot in separate sheet. The accused Malsawmtluangi, stated that she had received the said contraband from one Samuel T.T. Thanga @Thangtea (35) S/o T. Hauzaliana of Kolasib College Veng, who was also arrested in the presence of local witnesses and his arrest intimation was given to his wife. From the light of the enquiry and based on their statements recorded, Special Narcotic PS Case No. 12/2015 Dt. 29.05.2015 U/s 22(c)/29 ND&PS Act was registered and duly investigated into.

4. The FSL examination report was received from the Dy. SP CID (Crime), vide No. SP/CRM/ST-109/2014/1990 dt. 10.07.2017 which indicated that the exhibit C (AZL)-328(1) to C (AZL)-328(10) were found to contain Methamphetamine. From the above circumstances and statements adduced, the involvement of the accused persons was found clearly proved for the violation of Section 8 (c) of ND&PS Act

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top