IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MARLI VANKUNG, J.
Lalmuanpuii W/o Andrew Lalrinkima (L) – Petitioner
Versus
Lalchhuanawmi M/o Andrew Lalrinkima (L) – Respondent
R.F.A. No. 6 of 2022, I.A. (Civil) No. 21 of 2022
Decided On : 23-01-2024
Succession Certificate - Remand for Denovo Trial - The court set aside and quashed the impugned order granting Succession Certificate to the respondent No. 1 due to lack of notice and opportunity for the appellant to contest the application. The matter is remanded back to the trial court for a fresh consideration, ensuring fair and equal opportunity for both parties.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, wife of the deceased, filed an appeal against the order granting Succession Certificate to the respondent No. 1 without notice or opportunity to contest the application.
Finding of the Court:
The court set aside and quashed the impugned order, remanding the matter back to the trial court for a fresh consideration, ensuring fair and equal opportunity for both parties.
Issues: Lack of notice and opportunity for the appellant to contest the application for Succession Certificate.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of providing both parties with a fair and equal opportunity to contest applications for Succession Certificate, and set aside the order due to the lack of notice and opportunity for the appellant.
Final Decision: R.F.A. No. 6/2022 stands disposed of as the court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the trial court for a fresh consideration.
JUDGMENT :
MARLI VANKUNG, J.
1. Mr. Lawmawma Ralte appears on behalf of his senior, Mr. B. Lalramenga, learned counsel for the appellant along with Mr. Aldrin Lallawmzuala, learned counsel for the main respondent No. 1, while respondent Nos. 2 to 5 are the proforma respondents.
2. It is seen that the instant Regular First Appeal has been filed against the impugned Order dated 17.01.2022 passed by the Court of Senior Civil Judge-III, Aizawl in SC No. 5/2022 granting Succession Certificate to the respondent No. 1 in respect of the money kept in one Saving Bank Account and 3 (three) Fixed Deposit Accounts by the late Andrew Lalrinkima of Tuikual North. It is seen that the appellant is the wife of late Andrew Lalrinkima and respondent No. 1 is the mother. The Succession Certificate was issued on the same day the application was made without issuing any notice to the appellant.
3. Mr. Aldrin Lallawmzula, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 in all fairness submits that he has conceded to the fact that no notice was issued by the learned Trial Court before issuing the Succession Certificate to the respondent No. 1 in respect of the Bank Account and Fixed Deposit kept by the late Andrew Lalrinkima. The learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 submits that he has no objection to the prayer made by the appellant for referring the matter back to the learned Trial Court for Denovo trial of the matter.
4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, this Court finds it fit to set aside and quashed the impugned Order dated 17.01.2022 passed by the Court of Senior Civil Judge-III, Aizawl in SC No. 5/2022 granting Succession Certificate to the respondent No. 1 since no notice was issued and the appellant was not given the opportunity to contest the application made by the respondent No. 1 for issuance of Succession Certificate. The matter is remanded back to the learned Trial Court to consider the matter afresh by giving an opportunity to the instant appellant to contest the said application for issuance of Succession Certificate in respect of the money kept in one Saving Bank Account and 3 (three) Fixed Deposit Accounts by the late Andrew Lalrinkima. The learned trial court shall ensure that a fair and equal opportunity is given to both the parties to adduce their evidences before the Court. Thus, both the parties are to appear before the learned Trial Court in person or through their counsels on 16.02.2024 for further necessary steps.
5. Accordingly, R.F.A. No. 6/2022 stands disposed of as above.
Importance of providing both parties with a fair and equal opportunity to contest applications for Succession Certificate.
Mandatory disclosure of near relatives is essential for succession certificate applications under the Act.
Point of Law : Surviving husband of the deceased has rightly made the application for issuing the Heirship Certificate in the name of his only daughter.
A succession certificate obtained without notifying all legal heirs and through misrepresentation is subject to revocation under the Indian Succession Act.
Suppression of important facts regarding legal heirs and divorce from the deceased can lead to revocation of a succession certificate.
judgment and decree passed by the learned First Appellate Court having come to the conclusion that the proceedings for obtaining Succession Certificate was defective and the Certificate was obtained ....
Compromise awards in succession cases must adhere to procedural requirements, including proper notice and investigation, to prevent fraudulent outcomes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.