IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Devashis Baruah, J.
Shri Rakesh Ranjan – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Nagaland, Represented By The Chief Secretary And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C)/126/2023
Decided On : 01-03-2024
Regularization - Appointment against Sanctioned Post - Office Memorandum dated 18.02.2004 - [FACT OF THE CASE] The petitioner sought to set aside an order and sought regularization and seniority from 16.01.2004. [FINDING OF THE COURT] The court found that the petitioner's appointment was not against a sanctioned post and his seniority was correctly fixed from the date of regularization. [ISSUES] Whether the petitioner was entitled to regularization under Category-I of the Office Memorandum and whether the petition suffered from delay and laches. [RATIO DECIDENDI] The petitioner's appointment was not against a sanctioned post and his seniority was correctly fixed from the date of regularization. The petition suffered from delay and laches. [FINAL DECISION] The writ petition was dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Taka Masa, the learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. Arenglong, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. I have also heard Ms. S. Mere, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State Respondents.
2. The petitioner herein has filed the instant writ petition to set aside/review/reconsider the impugned order No.ED/MISC-2/2004-2005/180-209 dated 05.07.2010 only with regard to the Petitioner issued by the Director, School Education and further seeking a direction upon the Respondent Authorities to review and re-fix the date of regularization and the seniority of the Petitioner w.e.f. 16.01.2004 with all consequential benefits.
3. The case of the Petitioner in brief is that the Petitioner was appointed as a Graduate Teacher on Ad-hoc basis vide an order No.ED/EL/C/2/92-93(PT) dated 12.03.1993 issued by the Director, Department of School Education and posted at Government Middle School, Tanhai, Mon. It is relevant to take note of the appointment order which has been enclosed as Annexure-A. From a perusal of the said appointment order, it reveals that the appointment of the Petitioner on Ad-hoc basis was against the transfer vacancy which arose in view of Shri N.T. Shitri who was transferred to the Government High School Chunlikha. Subsequent thereto, the Petitioner was granted two increments vide an order dated 18.06.1993 upon passing B.Ed. On 24.03.2008, the Petitioner upon completion of 10 years of continuous service under the establishment of the Deputy Inspector of Schools, Mon was granted a Senior Grade scale of pay w.e.f. 12.08.2003.
4. The Government of Nagaland in its Personal and Administrative Reforms Department (Administrative Reforms Branch) issued a Memorandum dated 18.02.2004. The said Memorandum was issued in pursuance to a Committee constituted to examine the issues relating to the large number of Ad-hoc/contract employees appointed in the past in various State Government Offices and the said Committee recommended solutions for taking various measures with the existing situation and to prevent recurrence of such appointment in future. The Cabinet of the Government of Nagaland on 16.01.2004 approved the said recommendations which resulted in the Office Memorandum dated 18.02.2004. In the said Memorandum, a decision was taken as regards the existing Ad-hoc/contract employees. There were two categories as per the said Memorandum. Category-I related to Ad-hoc/contract appointment made against sanctioned post whereas Category-II were Casual/fixed pay appointments without any sanctioned post. Category-I was sub-categorized into three groups. The first group were those employees having more than 10 years of service. In respect to the said group, an employee may be considered for regularization provided:
(ii) The employee fulfils all the eligibility criteria for the post including the requisite educational qualification; and
(iii) The performance of the employee has been satisfactory in the service.
In this sub-category, the requirement was that the concerned department shall submit specific cases to the Government for approval after obtaining the recommendations of a Screening Committee composing of various members.
The second sub-category are for those employees having 5 to 10 years of service who would also be regularized if there was a sanction post; the employee fulfilled all eligibility criteria for the post including the requisite educational qualifications and the performance of the employee had been satisfactory in the service. However, the difference between this sub-category with the sub-category of those employees having more than 10 years of service was that these employees having 5 to 10 years of service have to appear in an examination (both written and/or viva-voce) to test the suitability which was to be organized by the concerned Department under the supervision of the Administrative Training Institute, Nagaland, Kohima and those
The court established that an employee appointed on an adhoc basis against a sanctioned post is entitled to regularization and seniority from the date of their initial appointment if similarly situat....
Point of Law : Supreme Court while taking into consideration a dispute pertaining to inter se seniority, held that seniority of appellants before Supreme Court can be reckoned only from date of regul....
The court upheld the direction for regularization of the respondent's service in terms of the memorandum dated 18.02.2004, despite the subsequent OMs, and dismissed the review petition filed by the a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's long service as a Trained Graduate Teacher against a substantive vacant post and the Government's decision to declare the non....
The court affirmed that administrative actions must be taken within a reasonable time frame, and the cancellation of a long-standing appointment based on flawed reasoning is unjustified.
The cancellation of an employee's regularization based on arbitrary grounds violates principles of non-discrimination and due process, necessitating restoration of benefits to similarly situated indi....
Prolonged service of over ten years without legal hindrance can qualify employees for regularization, regardless of the initial nature of their appointments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.