Back
M. NAGAPRASANNA
Raghavendra, S/o Srinivas Deshpande – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka Represented By Its Additional Chief Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common facts leading to the petitions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against regularization. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's reasoning on claims against the government. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. consistency in service records. (Para 8) |
| 5. court's authority to enforce regularization. (Para 9) |
| 6. principles regarding regularization of services. (Para 10 , 14 , 19) |
| 7. final order on regularization. (Para 20) |
ORDER :
Conglomeration of these cases seek a common prayer though the petitioners are different. The prayer that is sought is quashment of endorsement issued declining to accede to the request of the petitioners for regularization of their services and seek a consequential direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to regularize the services of the petitioners with all benefits and in cases of those who have retired from service to extend all terminal benefits.
2. The Facts that lead the petitioners to this Court, in the subject petitions, as borne out from the pleadings, are as follows:
The facts narrated in all these petitions are common except the dates of entry of the petitioners into service of N.A. Muttanna Memorial Police Children’s Residential School, Police Head
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
