KALYAN RAI SURANA
Amal Chandra Bora, S/o Late Dinanath Bora – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
Heard Mr. B.D. Das, senior counsel, assisted by Ms. B.B. Hussain and Mr. H.R. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. P.R. Mahanta, learned Standing counsel for the Higher Education Department, representing respondent nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. D.J. Boro, learned counsel for the respondent no.5.
2. By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the work-order no. JIST/TMC/2022/566 dated 26.06.2023, for hiring buses on contract basis, issued by the Principal, Jorhat Institute of Science and Technology, Jorhat (JIST for short) (respondent no.4) issued in favour of respondent no.5.
3. The case of the petitioner is that he is the owner of 2 (two) numbers of buses, which was provided on hire to the JIST upto 31.07.2023. On 28.03.2023, the respondent no.4 had issued notice inviting tender (NIT for short) for awarding contract for hiring of buses, with stipulation that the vehicles offered should not be older than more than 5 (five) years and should not have more than 30-35 seating capacity. The said NIT was assailed by the petitioner by filing a writ petition before this Court, which was registered as W.P.(C) 2283/2023. The said writ
Air India Ltd. Vs. Cochin International Airport Ltd & ors.
Dutta Associates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Indo Merchantiles Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Reliance Airport Developers (P) Ltd. v. Airports Authority of India and others
Reliance Energy Limited & Anr. v. Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.