JUDGMENT :

SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA, J.

1. Mr. C.S. Rawat, Advocate, has filed his “Authority” on behalf of the respondent no. 2, the same is accepted, and is taken on record.

2. The petitioner to the present writ petition is a prospective tenderer in pursuance to the invitation of bids, as it was floated by the respondents, for the purposes of fee, for the executing a contract for recovery of the Mussoorie Eco Tourism, the period from 01.06.2022 to 31.03.2023 and for the purposes of collecting the toll charges. The petitioner has raised his grievances, as against the tender condition of Technical Bid (k) Nos. 2 and 4 itself, which are extracted hereunder:

^^2- ;g fd mRrjk[k.M jkT; ds fdlh Hkh uxj ikfydk ifj"kn~ vFkok uxj fuxe esa U;wure 50-00 yk[k Áfro"kZ dk dk;Z djus dk Áek.k i= layXu djuk gksxkA

3- ;g fd ftykf/kdkjh vFkok mi&ftykf/kdkjh ds gLrk{kjksa ls fuxZr pfj= Áek.k i=] ftldh vof/k tkjh gksus dh frfFk ls 06 ekg gks ÁLrqr djkuk gksxkA**

3. In fact by virtue of the tender condition no. 2, it had been provided, that the prospective tenderer should have an experience of having performed a work of minimum value of Rupees Fifty Lakh, with any Nagar Palika Parishad or Nagar Nigam of the Sta