N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Damli Bomjen, Son of Tadam Bomjen – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. , represented by the PP of A. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. S. D. Loda, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. T. Jini, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Arunachal Pradesh.
2. The petitioners who are the accused and informant respectively in connection with Yingkion P.S. Case No. 06/2023 under Sections 354D/500 IPC, have jointly instituted the present proceedings praying for quashing of the connected F.I.R. dated 03.02.2023, on the basis of a compromise entered into between them on resolution of the misapprehensions that had developed between them.
3. The petitioner no. 2, herein, had lodged an F.I.R. on 03.02.2023 against the petitioner no. 1, herein, before the Police of Yingkion Police Station, inter alia, alleging that the petitioner no. 1, herein, had lodged an F.I.R. against the petitioner no. 2, wherein, he had levelled unwarranted allegations against her which had the effect of defaming her reputation before the society. It was further contended by the petitioner no. 2 in the said F.I.R., that the petitioner no. 1 had been following her madly since last 8 (eight) to 9 (nine) months continuously disturbing her and causing mental harassment to her. It was further alleged that the pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.