SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 588

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
MITALI THAKURIA, J.
Shri Wangngam Lowang, S/o Shri Wanghai Lowang – Appellant
Versus
The State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondents
WP(C) No. 565(AP) of 2013
Decided on : 14-06-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. T. Jamoh, Adv. Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms. G. Ete, G.A.

IMPORTANT POINT
The acquittal by a criminal court does not absolve a person from liability under disciplinary jurisdiction, and the nature of evidence in criminal trial is different from departmental proceedings.

Headnote:

Natural Justice - Departmental Enquiry - Arunachal Pradesh Police (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1999 - Article 226 - 18 of the Arunachal Pradesh Police (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1999

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a police personnel, was detailed to guard a Judicial Custody where 3 UTPs escaped during his duty hours. He was subjected to a Departmental Enquiry and awarded major punishment for negligence and misconduct.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's absence during duty hours led to the escape of UTPs, and the punishment awarded was appropriate and commensurate with the misconduct.

Issues: The issues revolved around the petitioner's duty, responsibility, and the application of the Arunachal Pradesh Police (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1999.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the acquittal by a criminal court does not absolve the petitioner from liability under disciplinary jurisdiction, and the nature of evidence in criminal trial is different from departmental proceedings.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed as the court found no merit in challenging the Departmental Enquiry and Punishment Order.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. T. Jamoh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. G. Ete, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents.

2. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ in the nature of certiorari or mandamus or any other appropriate writ, directing the respondents to accord proportionate and commensurating punishment to the petitioner apart from major penalty.

3. This writ petition has been filed challenging the Departmental Enquiry Proceeding and punishment Order No. DE-020/2NDBN/RNG/07, dated 14.11.2008, issued by the Commandant, 2nd AAP BN BHQ, Aalo, whereby the petitioner has been inflicted with major punishment of reduction of lower stage in the same time scale of pay with cumulative effect permanently, i.e. Rs. 3,200/-, and the period of suspension w.e.f. 12.11.2007 to 27.03.2008 treated not spent in duty.

4. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the petitioner along with 5 (five) numbers of police personnel, were detailed to guard Judicial Custody, Roing w.e.f. 29.10.2007 for 1 (one) month. As the duty deployment was for 1 (one) long month in the static post, the petitioner (Guard Commander) and the IInd Guard Commander decided to command guard of Judicial Custody alternatively on roster basis, i.e. 12 hours each a day. Accordingly, the roster was prepared by the petitioner along with the IInd Guard Commander and as per the roster duty, on 10.11.2007, the present petitioner was on guard duty from 8.00 a.m. to 12.00 noon and thereafter he was relieved by the IInd Guard Commander and accordingly, the petitioner went for his lunch and to take rest. At about 2.30 p.m., the petitioner reported to his guard post and relieved the IInd Guard Commander and from 2.30 p.m. to 5.30 p.m., he was the In-Charge of the Guard Commander and he being the Guard Commander also assured that the UTPs were given their meal at 6.00 p.m. and thereafter he went to his residence to take rest as he was to relieve the IInd Guard Commander at 9.30 p.m. During his break hours, while he was on his residence on 10.11.2007, at around 9.15 p.m., he got a telephonic call from his IInd Guard Commander that 3 (three) UTPs managed to escape from their Judicial Custody, Roing. Immediately, the petitioner rushed to the Judicial Custody along with two Armed Police Personnel and tried their best to apprehend the escaped UTPs, but fails. On the day of incident, i.e. on 10.11.2007, at evening hours, after the petitioner left, one Constable, namely, Ct Moken Angu, was on Sentry duty from 8.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. under the command of IInd Guard Commander, opened the main door of the UTP Cell and took out one UTP, namely, Shri Bhoirab Urang, who was an accused of a murder case, and asked him to message his body. After getting his body message, the said Ct Moken Angu sent the said UTP outside of the UTP Cell to the residence of Ct Gemin Dai to purchase liquor twice. Thereafter, the said Ct Moken Angu collected the liquor from UTP and after consuming the liquor fetched by UTP Bhoirab Urang, he again asked the said UTP to bring more liquor leaving the Cell Key and service riffle to the UTP Bhoirab Urang in the Guard Room. The said Ct Moken Angu again brought one full bottle of liquor from the residence of one Lama’s residence, which is about half kilometer far from his sentry post and thereafter he drunk the liquor and also shared the liquor with the said UTP. Under intoxication, the said Ct Moken Angu entered into the main UTP Cell leaving the UTP Bhoirab Urang in the Guard Room freely with the service rifle and keys of the UTP Cell. At that time, 3 (three) other UTPs, namely, Tagume Misso, Ragmuk Padu and Sanjit Borgohain, came out from the UTP Cell and went into the Guard Room and they pushed the UTP Bhoirab Urang inside the UTP Cell and locked the main door of the UTP Cell and very comfortably walked away from the Judicial Custody, Roing. The entire incident took place between 8.00 p.m. to 9.15 p

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top