IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Shichaba, S/o Shri Imnayanglu – Appellant
Versus
The Union Of India And Ors – Respondents
WP(C)91 of 2019
Decided on : 13-06-2024
Communication - Retail Outlet Dealerships - Brochure for selection of dealers of the respondent Corporation - 24.11.2018 - The court discussed the affidavit-cum-declaration, legal report, and the categorization of applicants into Group-1, Group-2, and Group-3 as per the brochure for selection of dealers of the respondent Corporation. The court emphasized the importance of the offered land and the mode of selection by draw of lots among the categorized groups.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the communication issued by the respondent Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. regarding the selection of retail outlet dealerships in Nagaland. The petitioner submitted an application offering a plot of land, but due to the loss of original documents, the respondent Corporation relegated the petitioner to Group-3 instead of Group-1.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's offered land was the same despite the submission of different documents, and directed the respondent Corporation to consider the petitioner's case along with other applicants in accordance with the terms and conditions stipulated in the brochure for selection of retail outlet dealership dated 24.11.2018.
Issues: The dispute revolved around the categorization of the petitioner into Group-1 or Group-3 and the acceptance of the submitted documents by the respondent Corporation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of the offered land and the mode of selection by draw of lots among the categorized groups as per the brochure for selection of dealers of the respondent Corporation.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the petition, directing the respondent Corporation to consider the petitioner's case along with other applicants in accordance with the terms and conditions stipulated in the brochure for selection of retail outlet dealership dated 24.11.2018, and allowed 15 days for the petitioner to submit the required affidavit. If the petitioner fails to do so, the respondent Corporation is at liberty to carry out the selection in accordance with its guidelines.
JUDGMENT :
The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned communication dated 22.02.2019 as well as the communication dated 27.03.2019 issued by the respondent Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (IOCL)
2. The Indian Oil Corporation (herein after referred to as ‘the respondent Corporation’) had issued an advertisement in their website about the appointment of retail outlet dealerships in the State of Nagaland. On the same date, the said advertisement was also published in the local newspapers. In terms with the said advertisement dated 25.11.2018, the applications were to be submitted on or before 25.12.2018. The present writ petition pertains to the location on Manja-Dimapur Road on NH29 from Nagaland Gate within 2 kms. towards St. John’s College.
3. The petitioner submitted his application on 25.12.2018. In doing so, the petitioner offered a plot of land at Indisen Village, Dimapur, Nagaland vide village Patta No.429 dated 25.06.2015 bearing registered No.322/15 under in Indisen Village Council situated at Manja-Dimapur Road on NH29. It was the requirement as per the brochure for selection for retail outlets of respondent Corporation that at the time of submission of the application, various documents were required to be submitted. Amongst the various documents, one document was a notarized affidavit by the applicant as per Appendix-X, A/XB (standard affidavit), as applicable and the other document was the Appendix-IIIB (Advocate’s letter) along with Appendix-IIIA (for offer of land), if applicable. Admittedly, the petitioner submitted the said affidavit-cum-declaration as well as the Advocate’s certificate. Both were dated 22.12.2018.
4. On 19.01.2019, the respondent No.4 vide an email informed the petitioner that the petitioner had qualified for the draw of lots for selection of the retail outlet dealership and requested the petitioner to be present personally with the Photo Identity Card issued by any Government Department on 1st of February, 2019 at 1300 hours. Subsequent thereto, vide another email dated 02.02.2019, the respondent No.4 informed the petitioner that he has been selected on draw of lots for award of retail outlet dealership on the Manja-Dimapur Road on NH29 from Nagaland Gate within 2 kms. towards St. John’s College, District-Dimapur under the ST category advertised on 25.11.2018. On the same date, the respondent No.4 had also informed the petitioner to remit online Rs.30,000/- towards security deposit and submit a set of documents specified in the email within 10 days in the Office of the respondent No.4 for processing the application for award of retail outlet dealership at Manja-Dimapur Road on NH29 from Nagaland gate within 2 kms. towards St. John’s College, District-Dimapur under the ST category.
5. It is the further case of the petitioner that on 04.02.2019, the petitioner lost the affidavit-cum-declaration executed before the Notary Public, Nagaland dated 22.12.2018 as well as the search report issued by the Advocate, namely, Shri Kimonthung Lotha whereby it was certified by the concerned Advocate that the petitioner offer would fall within the ambit of Group-1. In that regard, the petitioner had also filed an FIR before the Mokokchung Police Station-II which was duly entered as GD Entry No.02/19 dated 05.02.2019. The petitioner therefore again came back to Dimapur on 06.02.2019 and tried to contact Shri Kimonthung Lotha, Advocate to obtain and authenticate the copy of the affidavit-cum- declaration dated 22.12.2018 and the legal report dated 22.12.2018. However, as Shri Kimonthung Lotha, Advocate was reported to be out of station and at Wokha, the petitioner could not get the authenticated copy of the lost affidavit-cum-declaration dated 22.12.2019 and the legal report dated 22.12.2018. It is under such circumstances, the petitioner as a matter of abundant caution executed another affidavit-cum-declaration on 07.02.2019 before another Notary Public at Dimapur and obtained another legal report
The importance of the offered land and the mode of selection by draw of lots among the categorized groups as per the brochure for selection of dealers of the respondent Corporation.
Point of Law : All certificates/documents required for meeting specific eligibility criteria should be in possession of the applicant and valid as on date of application.
The conformity letter from an advocate plays a crucial role in determining the eligibility of the offered land and the applicant's title to it, and the rejection based solely on the conformity letter....
Point of Law : Candidature of petitioner under Group-1 was rejected/found ineligible with an observation that candidature of the petitioner would be considered for selection along with Group-3 applic....
Applicants must meet the eligibility criteria for the respective groups and submit necessary documents as per the requirement of the group applied for.
The court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's application for a retail outlet dealership due to failure to meet land suitability criteria as per the Brochure guidelines.
Point of law: only in accordance with the terms and conditions which makes it mandatory for submission of Appendix-III A and Appendix-III B along with the application, the respondent Oil Corporation ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.