SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Gau) 910

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Devashis Baruah, J.
Mrs. Nurjahan Khatun W/o Late Samial Hussain – Petitioner
Versus
The Union of India, Represented By The Secretary, Petroleum And Natural Gas – Respondent
WP(C)/5267 of 2021
Decided On : 24-08-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. B.J. Ghosh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. A. Barkataki, Advocate

Point of Law : Candidature of petitioner under Group-1 was rejected/found ineligible with an observation that candidature of the petitioner would be considered for selection along with Group-3 applicants as per the guidelines.

Headnote:

Selection of dealers for regular and rural retail - Eligibility criteria - Challenged decision - Whether there was any legal representative who would be entitled to land taking into account that devolving of right over the land of husband of the petitioner would be automatic upon the demise of husband of petitioner - Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the husband of petitioner, at the time of his death, had left behind the petitioner as well a son and a daughter. Para 14

Finding of Court : Court has also perused the guidelines, details of which have been referred to hereinabove wherein it clearly mandates that if land belongs to applicant with members of family or owned exclusively by the family member(s), consent letter in the form of affidavit from members of the family in Appendix-III A was required to be submitted at the time of submission of the application - Court is of opinion that there was no illegality in communication dated whereby candidature of the petitioner under Group-1 was rejected/found ineligible with an observation that candidature of the petitioner would be considered for selection along with Group-3 applicants as per guidelines.

Result : Writ petition dismissed

JUDGMENT :

The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the decision of the respondent No.3 contained in the letter dated 04.03.2020 whereby it was mentioned that the land documents submitted by the petitioner were not valid for considering the offered land under Group-1 and the petitioner was informed that the candidature of the petitioner would be considered for selection along with Group-3 applicants as per the guidelines. The petitioner had also by way of the instant writ petition sought for a writ of mandamus upon the respondent Nos.2 & 3 to reconsider the case of the petitioner for Group-1.

2. Before dealing with the facts of the case, this Court finds it relevant to take note of that there is a Brochure for selection of dealers for regular and rural retail outlets dated 24.11.2018. The said Brochure contains various Guidelines for selection of dealers for regular and rural retail outlets through Draw of Lots/Bidding Process.

3. In the said Guidelines, Clause 4 stipulates the eligibility criteria for individual applicant-proprietorship/partnership. Sub-Clause (v) of Clause 4 classifies three groups based on the land offered or land not offered by them in the application form. In Group-1, the applicants have been clubbed together who have suitable piece of land in the advertised location/area either by way of ownership/long term lease for a period of minimum 19 years 11 months or as advertised by the OMC. In Group 2, those applicants have been clubbed who have firm offer for a suitable piece of land for purchase or long term lease for a period of minimum 19 years 11 months or as advertised by the OMC. In Group-3, those applicants are clubbed who have not offered land in the application. It is further mentioned in Sub-Clause (v) of Clause 4 that applications of applicants under Group-3 would be processed/advised to offer land only in case no eligible applicant is found or no applicant get selected under Group 1 & 2. It is further mentioned that in case, land offered by all the applicants under Group 1 and Group 2 is found not suitable/not meeting requirements, then those applicants under Group 1 and Group 2 along with applicants under Group 3 (who did not offer land along with application) would be advised by the OMC to provide suitable land in the advertised location/stretch, within a period of 3 months from the date of issuance of intimation letter to them through SMS/e-mail. It is further stipulated that in case the applicants fail to provide suitable land within the prescribed period or the land provided is found not meeting the laid down criteria, the application would be rejected.

4. Further to that, there are various other conditions with respect to offering of the land. Amongst the various conditions, Condition (d) stipulates that the applicants under Group-1 should have documents to establish ownership of land offered for the dealership as on date of application, such as Khasra/Khatauni or any equivalent Revenue document or certificate from Revenue Official confirming status of the ownership of the land or registered Sale Deed/registered Gift Deed or registered Lease Deed for a minimum period of 19 years and 11 months (as advertised by respective Oil Company) or any other type of ownership/transfer deed document or lease agreement or firm allotment letter issued by Government /Semi Government bodies.

5. The Condition (e) is very relevant for the purpose of the instant case which stipulates that the land owned by the family member(s) will also be considered as belonging to the Applicant (Group-1) subject to producing the consent letter in the form of affidavit (Appendix III A) from the concerned family member(s).

6. In Condition (j), there is a detailed Table mentioned stipulating the various conditions of ownership for defining owned/firm offer. At Serial No.2 of the said Table in respect of self members of family or owned exclusively by family member(s), the document which is required to be su

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top