Back
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Ravindra Tana Tara, S/o Lt. Nerba Tana – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Tadup Tana Tara, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Ito Riram, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of all the respondents.
2. The petitioner by way of instituting the present proceeding, has presented a challenge to the institution of an appeal before the Arunachal Pradesh State Food Commission under Section 20 of the National Food Security Act, 2013, by the Chairman, State Level Vigilance Committee, Food & Civil Supplies Department, Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar, & 5(five) others, against an order passed by the District Grievance Redressal Officer(DGRO), East Kameng District, Seppa, in C.R. Case No. DGRO-001/2018, dated 20.07.2018.
3. The brief facts requisite for adjudication of the issue arising in the present proceeding, is noticed as under:
The petitioner, in the writ petition, has projected himself to be the proprietor of M/s. Nangnyo Nampin Multi-Purpose Co-operative Society Ltd., which is registered under Section 9 of the Arunachal Pradesh Cooperative Society Act, 1978, and carrying-on the business of drawal, lifting and transportation of PDS items through road transport(vehicula
The main legal principle established in the judgment is that only authorized complainants or authorities can file appeals before the State Commission under the National Food Security Act, 2013, and a....
The court directed the government to fill the vacant ST category position in the Andhra Pradesh State Food Commission, emphasizing eligibility without gender restriction under the National Food Secur....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a complainant, as a person annoyed, does not have the legal right to challenge a decision and is only entitled to participate in the inquiry p....
The court established that the provisions of the National Food Security Act impose a duty on the government to ensure the supply of nutritious food to vulnerable populations, and any arbitrary withdr....
Wilful disobedience is essential to establish contempt of court; mere delays in compliance do not qualify as contempt, especially in the context of fulfilling welfare obligations under the National F....
The court established that changes in law do not retroactively invalidate applications made under prior rules unless explicitly stated.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
