Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Ahuja – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the contempt petition and background case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments highlighting alleged non-compliance and issues with aadhar authentication. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. defenses provided by the respondent regarding compliance with previous orders. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's review of compliance and steps taken by the respondent. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. clarifications on the meaning of 'wilful disobedience' in contempt cases. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. the court's assessment that there was no wilful disobedience of orders. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. final observations on the welfare implications of the nfsa. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 8. conclusion rejecting the contempt petition. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT
Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J.
1. The present Contempt Petition is arising out of an interlocutory order dated 01.09.2017 passed in W.P.(C)No. 2161/2017 titled as Delhi Rozi-Roti Adhikar Abhiyan Vs. Union of India and Ors.
2. The Contempt Petition has been filed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 by the Petitioner alleging willful non-compliance of Order dated 01.09.2017 of this Court. It is stated that vide Order dated 01.09.2017, Respondent No. 2, Govt. of National Capi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
