BUDI HABUNG
Tangmong S/O Pachi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nagaland And Anr Represented By The Public Prosecutor – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Heard Mr. Toshi O. Longkumer, learned counsel for the petitioners. I have also heard Mr. V. Zhimomi, learned PP for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. L. Iralu, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.
2. This is an application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying for quashing of the Criminal Proceedings in Criminal Complaint Case No. 1/2023 pending before the Court of JMFC, Kohima, Nagaland.
3. The case of the petitioners, 14 in numbers, in brief is that being aggrieved by the appointment of Assistant Professors on contract basis at State College of Teachers Education (SCTE), Kohima without qualification sine advertisement, the petitioners along with 20 others filed the writ petition before this Court being registered as WP(C)/340/2022 assailing the appointment of the present respondent No. 2/complainant along with 30 others arraying them as private respondent Nos. 4 to 34 on the ground that they were all appointed without having requisite qualification sine advertisement. The said writ petition is still pending before this Court.
4. Being aggrieved by the contention made in the writ petition being WP(C)/340/2022, t
Grievances Redressal Officer, Economic Times Internet Ltd. And Ors Vs. V. V. Minerals Pvt. Ltd.
Himanshu Bhatt Vs. Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation and Ors
Kishore Balkrishna Nand V. State of Maharashtra and Anr
M.K. Varghese Cor Episcopa Vs. State of Kerela and Anr
R.Rajagopal vs. J.Jayalalitha (AIR 2006 Mad 312)
Rajesh Rangarajan Vs. Crop Care Federation of India and Anr
Sewakram Sobhani Vs. R. K. Karanjia, Chief Editor, Weekly Blitz and Ors
The essential elements of defamation under IPC Section 499 require intent to harm the reputation of the complainant, which was not established in this case, highlighting the balance between defamatio....
The court established that defamation claims require clear intent to harm, and the absence of such intent, along with applicable exceptions, can lead to quashing of proceedings.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of exception 8 to Section 499 of the IPC, emphasizing the need for good faith and lawful authority in making accusations and the....
A lack of governmental consent under Section 196(2) Cr.P.C. does not bar prosecution for defamation offences, emphasizing the media's role in reporting on public matters.
Sanction for prosecuting a public servant is not required at the initial stage if the alleged offense is not inseparably linked to official duty. Furthermore, a magistrate satisfies the statutory req....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.