IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
Pulen Dey, S/o. Gobinda Mohan Dey – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam And 7 Ors. – Respondents
WP(C)/167/2019
Decided on : 19-05-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. notification validity and astc's service domain. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioners argue against astc's authorized testing. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. entitlement of astc to operate an authorized testing station. (Para 7 , 11) |
| 4. procedure for approval under rtc act and mv act. (Para 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. finality of legal findings related to astc's operations. (Para 18 , 19 , 28) |
| 6. partial allowance of the writ petition. (Para 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT :
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
The two petitioners have instituted the writ petition to invoke the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for assailment of a Notification bearing no. TMV.263/2015/84 dated 17.12.2018 issued by the Transport Department, Government of Assam under the hand of the Secretary to the Government of Assam, Transport Department.
2. In the Notification dated 17.12.2018, it is mentioned that a proposal had been submitted by the Assam State Transport Corporation [hereinafter referred to as ‘the ASTC’ or ‘the respondent Corporation’, at places, for easy reference] to grant approval to it under Section 19 of the Road TRANSPORT CORPORATIONS ACT , 1950 to undertake the activity of operating Authorised Testing Stations in each of the districts of Assam with a copy of the Judgment and Order dated 27.09.2018 passed by this Court in the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 1395/2018 [Nagaon Jila Bus Paribahan Santha and two others vs. The State of Assam and another]. It further mentions that upon careful perusal and examination of the proposal submitted by the ASTC; the Judgment and Order dated 27.09.2018 [supra]; the relevant provisions of Section 19 of the Road TRANSPORT CORPORATIONS ACT , 1950; Section 56 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988; and Rule 63 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, it has been found that the ASTC has possessed the required qualifications and is fit to comply with all the requirements, as prescribed under the relevant provisions of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 and Rule 63 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 for setting up Authorised Testing Stations. Observing so, the State Government in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 19 of the Road TRANSPORT CORPORATIONS ACT , 1950 has accorded approval to the ASTC to operate Authorized Testing Stations in each of the districts of Assam with the further direction to the ASTC to follow the procedure prescribed under Rule 63 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 and Section 56 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1998. By the Notification dated 17.12.2018, the ASTC has been permitted to realize service charge @ Rs. 300/-in respect of Light Motor Vehicles [LMV] and @ Rs. 500/-in respect of Medium and Heavy Motor Vehicles [MMVs & HMVs] apart from the statutory fees prescribed by the Transport Department, Government of Assam, which should be deposited to the State Exchequer.
3. Before going further, it may be stated that the Road TRANSPORT CORPORATIONS ACT , 1950 [Act no. 64 of 1950] has been enacted by the Parliament to provide for incorporation and regulation of Road Transport Corporations. As per the definition provided by Section 2 [b] thereof, ‘Corporation’ means a Road Transport Corporation established under Section 3 of the Act. Section 3 contained in ‘Chapter II : Road Transport Corporation’ of the Road TRANSPORT CORPORATIONS ACT , 1950 has provided for establishment of Road Transport Corporations in the States. Sections 3 states that the State Government having regard to – [a] the advantages offered to the public, trade and industry by the development of road transport; [b] the desirability of co-ordinating any form of road transport with any other form of transport; [c] the desirability of extending and improving the facilities for road transport in any area and of providing an efficient and economical system of road transport service therein, may, by notification in the Official Gazette, establish a Road Transport Corporation for the whole or any part of the S
Satyadhyan Ghosal and others vs. Deorjin Debi Smt and another
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation vs. State of U.P. and another
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Assam State Transport Corporation (ASTC) is empowered to operate an authorized testing station under section 19(2)(m) of the Transport Cor....
The State cannot impose conditions on Authorized Testing Stations requiring counter-signatures from Motor Vehicle Inspectors on fitness certificates, as it undermines their statutory authority establ....
The grant of permits to private operators on nationalized routes is prohibited under the scheme framed under Chapter IVA of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.
The State Transport Authority possesses statutory authority to impose safety regulations on transport vehicles, prioritizing public safety over procedural rights of individual permit holders.
Point of law: prescription of standards relating to testing and approval for body building of buses/sleeper coaches, as provided under Rule 125C of the Rules, 1989 are applicable to all buses/sleeper....
Suo motu applications for stage carriage route permits impermissible without prior route notification and publication; authorities must strictly adhere to procedural rules and binding precedents to p....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.