JUDGMENT :

Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J.

1. Heard Sri Siddharth Nandan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Amit Manohar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:

"I. A writ or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 14.02.2020 passed by Assistant Regional Transport Officer (Administration), Rampur i.e. Respondent No.4 (contained as Annexure No.03 to the writ petition).

II. A writ or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 14.02.2020 passed by the Additional Transport Commissioner (Revenue) Uttar Pradesh and order dated 21.01.2020 passed by Transport Commissioner, State of U.P. (contained as Annexure No.01 & 02 to the writ petition).

III. A writ or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent authorities not to interfere in the plying of the vehicles in question till such time the registration and fitness certificates are valid or notifications under Section 111 of the Act, 1988 are issued changing the norms."

3. In terms of the aforementioned prayers, the petitioners have sought to challenge the circula