SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1080

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
ANANDA BORO, S/O. THELA BORO AND ORS. – Petitioners
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA AND, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF INDIA, DEPTT OF POWER AND ORS. – Respondents
WP(C) No.8722 Of 2019
Decided On : 16-08-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. S.A. Ahmed, Ms. M. Gogoi, Ms. F. Ahmed, Mrs. P. Phukan.
For the Respondents: Asstt. S.G.I., SC, Revenue, SC, BTC, GA, Assam.

IMPORTANT POINT
The Court established that landowners have the right to seek compensation for land acquired under the Electricity Act and the Indian Telegraph Act, and disputes regarding compensation should be addressed by the District Judge.

Headnote:

COMPENSATION - LAND ACQUISITION - The Court addressed the issue of compensation for land acquired by the Power Grid Corporation for the erection of transmission towers. It highlighted the applicability of Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, particularly Section 10 and Section 16(3), which govern compensation disputes. The Court directed the petitioners to seek redress from the District Judge for compensation claims, emphasizing the legal framework for addressing such grievances.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged the acquisition of their lands by the Power Grid Corporation for the construction of transmission towers, claiming they received no compensation for the land or damages to crops and structures.

Finding of the Court:

The Court recognized the applicability of the Electricity Act and the Indian Telegraph Act regarding compensation for land acquisition. It noted the petitioners' right to seek compensation through the District Judge as per the relevant legal provisions.

Issues: Whether the petitioners are entitled to compensation for land acquired for transmission towers and the appropriate legal recourse for claiming such compensation.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court concluded that the petitioners should pursue their compensation claims under Section 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act, which allows for disputes regarding compensation to be adjudicated by the District Judge.

Result: The writ petition was disposed of with directions for the petitioners to file their application for compensation within 45 days, allowing the District Judge to adjudicate the matter.

JUDGMENT :

(N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.) :

Heard Mr. S. A. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the applicants. Also heard Ms. A. Gayan, the learned CGC appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 1 and Ms. M. Bordoloi, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2; Ms. K. Phukan, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents no. 3 & 4; Mr. U. Das, learned counsel for the respondents no. 5 & 6 as well as Mr. G. N. Sahewalla, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Power Grid Corporation, respondent no. 7.

2. In terms of the order passed today in IA(C)/2431/2024, the Power Grid Corporation of India Limited is impleaded as respondent no. 7 in the present proceeding and is represented by Mr. G. N. Sahewalla, learned Senior Counsel.

3. Registry is directed to make necessary corrections in the Cause-title of the present proceeding, incorporating therein, the Power Grid Corporation of India Limited, as respondent no. 7.

4. As consented to by the learned counsels appearing for the parties, the present proceeding is taken up for final consideration and disposal.

5. The petitioners, in the present proceeding are aggrieved by the acquisition of their respective lands for erection of Towers and High Voltage Transmission Lines by the Power Grid Corporation of India Limited, without paying any compensation to the petitioners, including Zirat.

6. It is the case of the petitioners that they were not paid any compensation for the land so utilized for erection of the Towers and further, no compensation was paid on account of the damages occassioning to the crops and other structures so standing on their lands due to the construction of Towers and High Voltage Transmission Lines.

7. This Court duly takes note of that by virtue of Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003; the provisions of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 have been made applicable in the matter of construction of overhead line by the licensee. Section 10 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 deals with the powers of the authority to place and maintain telegraph lines and posts. Section 16(3) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 provides that in case of any dispute as regards the sufficiency of the compensation, an application may be made before the District Judge within whose jurisdiction the property is situated.

8. Taking into account that the petitioners, herein, are aggrieved on account of non-payment of compensation, the petitioners, would be well advised to approach the learned District Judge, Baksa in terms with Section 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. In the circumstance, the said application is filed by the petitioners within a period of 45(forty five) days from today, the learned District Judge, Baksa shall proceed with the adjudication of the said proceedings in accordance with the applicable provisions of law.

9. With above observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top