ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Techi Atum, So of Late Techi Tad – Appellant
Versus
State Election Commission – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. D. Das, learned senior counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. K. Tiwari, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. K. Saxena, learned counsel representing respondent No. 4 and Ms. N. Anju, learned counsel for the respondent No1 and Ms. R. Basar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
2. The present writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for setting aside and quashing the judgment and order dated 15.05.2023, passed by learned Member, Arunachal Pradesh Panchayat Raj Tribunal at Yupia in Election Petition (PR) 03/2021 with a further direction to set aside and quash the election of the respondent No. 4 to the No. 11 Batt Ganga Zila Parishad Constituency (for short concerned ZPC).
3. The brief facts of the case leading to filing of the present writ petition can be recorded as follows:
II. The petitioner and the respondent No. 4 submitted nom
Chera Loma –Vs- State Election Commission and Ors reported in 2017 1 GauLT 469
Pothula Rama Rao –Vs- P. V. K. Rao reported in 2007 11 SCC 1
State of Gujrat and Ors. vs Utility Users Welfare Association and ors reported in (2018) 6 SCC 21
Jayanta Verma and Ors vs Union of India & Ors reported in (2018) 4 SCC 743
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.