SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1306

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH AT AIZAWL BENCH
NELSON SAILO, ROBIN PHUKAN, JJ.
(The State) The National Investigation Agency – Appellant
Versus
Rohmingliana @ Hmingte @ Hminga S/o C.L. Thuama – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2019
Decided On : 05-09-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : C. Zoramchhana.
For the Respondent: B. Lalramenga.

The prosecution failed to establish that the respondent had constructive possession over the seized arms, leading to the appeal's dismissal due to lack of evidence for conviction.

Headnote:(A) National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 - Section 21(1) - Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Section 23(2) - Arms Act, 1959 - Section 25(1AA) - Appeal against acquittal - Respondent acquitted of charges related to arms smuggling and unlawful activities - Prosecution failed to establish constructive possession over seized arms and ammunitions from the respondent's farmhouse. (Paras 49, 51, 62, 68)

(B) Principles governing appeal against acquittal - An appellate court has full power to review and re-appreciate evidence without limitation - Presumption of innocence strengthens upon acquittal; the prosecution must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 9, 10, 68)

Facts of the case:
The appellant challenged an acquittal of the respondent who was accused of aiding a terrorist group by facilitating the storage of arms in his farmhouse. Charged under the UAPA and Arms Act, evidence included testimonies and recovered arms, but crucial gaps in establishing possession led to the trial court's verdict.

Findings of Court:
The trial court concluded that acquired evidence did not sufficiently connect the respondent to the illegally possessed arms, resulting in his acquittal.

Issues: The main issues revolved around possession, knowledge, and the establishment of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt regarding the arms found.

Ratio Decidendi: The appellate court emphasized that mere suspicion is insufficient for conviction and reiterated the requirement of clear evidence of possession and intent by the accused.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. appeal relates to the acquittal under nia and arms act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. challenge focuses on the adequacy of evidence for possession. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court assesses evidentiary shortcomings sustaining acquittal. (Para 7 , 8 , 10)

JUDGMENT :

ROBIN PHUKAN, J.

1. Heard Mr. C. Zoramchhana, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the appellant, National Investigation Agency and Mr. B. Lalramenga, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. In this appeal, under Section 21 (1) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (“NIA Act” for short), the appellant has put to challenge the correctness or otherwise of the judgment and order dated 25.10.2018, passed by the learned Special Judge, NIA, Mizoram, Aizawl, in Crl. Trial No. 476 of 2013 (arising out of SC No. 97 of 2013, in Spl. NIA Case No. 1 of 2016).

3. It is to be noted here that vide impugned judgment and order dated 25.10.2018, the learned trial Court had acquitted the respondent, namely, Shri Rohmingliana @ Hmingte @ Hminga, of the charges under Sections 23 (2) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and under Section 25(1AA) of the ARMS ACT , 1959.

4. The background facts, leading to filing of the present appeal, are adumbrated herein-below:

    “On 09.03.2013, Sub-Inspector Lalsanga of Special Narcotics P.S., Aizawl, Mizoram had lodged one FIR with the Officer-in-Charge, Sairang Police Station, to the effect that acting on a tip off, that was received from the Surveillance Department of 26th Assam Rifles, a joint operation was launched by a team, led by 26th Assam Rifles and Special Narcotics P.S. CID Crime, Aizawl on 07.03.2013, at about 5 p.m. and from the farmhouse, belonging to Pu Rohmingliana, the respondent herein this case, situated at a distance of four kilometers from Lengpui Airport, four Bangladeshi nationals, three Chakma people, namely, (i) Moni Tripuri of Chittagong Hills Tract, Bangladesh, (ii) Robi Chakma of Chittagong Hills Tract, Bangladesh, (iii) Sabuj Chakma of Chittagong Hills Tract, Bangladesh and one Mizo namely, (iv) C. Lalnghakthanga of Sazep, Bangladesh were arrested and 31 numbers of AK47 rifle, LMG 1 No. and Browning Automatic Rifle 1 No. and ammunitions - (i) AK47 (7.62 mm)-86 live rounds, (ii) LMG (5.56 mm)-24 live rounds and, (iv) BAR rifle (7.62 mm)-699 live rounds were recovered and seized, and the arrested persons belong to Parbatya Chattagram Jana Samhati Samiti (PCJSS), a faction of Shanti Bahini Organization formed for upliftment of Chakma people in Bangladesh. Thereafter, the area was kept under surveillance of 26th Assam Rifles throughout the night and having seen suspicious movement, another joint operation was launched by 26th Assam Rifles in conjunction with Special Narcotics P.S. on 08.03.2013, at about 8 am and the operation team made further recovery of arms and ammunitions. And later on, the owner of the farmhouse, the respondent herein was arrested on 09.03.2013, at about 1:30 am from his house at Vaivakawn, Aizawl.

    On receipt of the aforesaid FIR, the Officer In-Charge, Sairang P.S. had registered a case being Sirang P.S. Case No. 8/2013, on 09.03.2013, under Section 25(1AA) of the ARMS ACT , read with Section 34 IPC, read with Section 14 FOREIGNERS ACT and endorsed SI Liansangzela to investigate the case. While investigation was being carried out by SI Lalsanga, the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Internal Security-I Division, vide letter dated 03.06.2013, by exercising the power under Section 6 (5), read with Section 8 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, transferred the case to the National Investigation Agency (“NIA” for short) for investigation. Thereafter, the NIA had registered a case, being RC-02/2013/NIA-GUW and carried out the investigation and after completion of investigation, laid final report/charge-sheet, being charge-sheet No. 01/2016, dated 14.03.2016, against accused Moni Tripuri, Sabuj Chakma, Robi Chakma, C. Lalnghakthanga @ Nghaka and the respondent Rohmingliana

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top