IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KARDAK ETE, J.
Dul Malla Buzar Baruah S/o. Lt. Bidya Malla Buzar Baruah – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam And 6 Ors. – Respondent
WP(c) 3299 of 2020
Decided on : 05-11-2024
(A) Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - Section 34 - Reservation in promotion - Petitioners, being persons with disabilities, sought promotion to Assistant Engineer (Civil) under 4% quota - Office Memorandum dated 17.01.2019 limited reservation to Grade-III and IV posts - Court held that petitioners are entitled to promotion under the Disabilities Act, 2016, as the respondent authorities failed to adhere to the mandate of law. (Paras 8, 12, 32, 34)
(B) Promotion - Right to be considered - Court emphasized that while no employee has a right to promotion, they have a right to be considered for promotion under applicable laws. (Paras 17, 32)
Facts of the case:
Petitioners, appointed as Junior Engineers, are persons with disabilities and sought promotion to Assistant Engineer (Civil) under the Disabilities Act, 2016. They were promoted without consideration of the disabled quota. (Paras 4, 6, 12)
Findings of Court:
Petitioners are entitled to be considered for promotion under the benchmark disabilities quota as the authorities failed to adhere to the law. (Paras 32, 34)
Issues: Whether petitioners are entitled to promotion under the Disabilities Act, 2016. (Paras 12, 32)
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioners must be considered for promotion under the Disabilities Act, 2016, as the authorities did not comply with the law. (Paras 32, 34)
Result: Writ petitions allowed to the extent indicated. (Para 35)
JUDGMENT :
Heard Ms. D. Borgohain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate for the State of Assam and Ms. P.P. Das, learned counsel appearing for the APSC.
2. Having considered that the issue involved in both writ petitions is analogous, same were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
3. By filing these two writ petitions, the petitioners have prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities to modify the O.M. dated 17.01.2019 so as to provide reservation in promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) under Public Works Department, Government of Assam. The petitioners have also prayed for a direction to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) against the 4% quota reserved for Persons With Disabilities (hereinafter PwD in short) as provided under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, (hereinafter referred to as the Disabilities Act, 2016 in short).
4. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners were appointed as Junior Engineer (Civil) under the Assam Public Works Department, who are PwDs. In WP(C) 3299/2020, the petitioner was appointed as Junior Engineer (Civil) under Assam Public Works Department, NH under Rangia Division on 03.10.1996. The petitioner suffers from Locomotor disability since 2014 and after re-examination of his disability, the Disability Certificate has been issued being registration No. 5088 dated 15.11.2017 to that effect and he has been receiving disability allowance since 19.08.2017.
5. In WP(C) 3317/2020, the petitioner was appointed as Junior Engineer (Civil) under Assam Public Works Department, Building on 21.11.1990. He became physical disabled in the year, 2016, which has been diagnosed as Spastic Left Hemiparesis and is a Locomotor Disability as per the provision contained in the rights of persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The petitioner has been issued a Disability Certificate being Certificate No. 1399 dated 16.08.2016. In course of their services, the petitioners in the meantime have become eligible to be promoted to the cadre of Assistant Engineer (Civil) and by now, have been promoted on their own merit and positions in the Department.
6. It is contended by the petitioners that under the Disabilities Act of 2016, the petitioners are entitled to a preferential treatment of reservation under the 4% reservation in terms of the provisions of the Disabilities Act, 2016.
7. It is the contention of the petitioners that office memorandum dated 07.01.2019 issued by the Department of Personnel (B), Government of Assam, inter alia, provides that the benefit of reservation in promotion for persons with benchmark disabilities will be limited to the Grade-III and IV posts, where 4% of the posts shall be reserved for persons with benchmark disabilities. Since the benefit of reservation in promotion for persons with benchmark disabilities will be limited to the Grade-III and IV posts only, the petitioner would be disentitled to a reservation in promotion to the cadre of Assistant Engineer (Civil) in the PWRD as because the cadre of Assistant Engineer (Civil) is Grade-II.
8. It is contended that as per the provision contained in Section-34 of the Disabilities Act, 2016, every appropriate Government shall appoint in every Government establishment not less than 4% of the total number of vacancies in the cadre strength in each group of posts meant to be filled up with persons with benchmark disabilities of which 1% each shall be reserved for persons with benchmark disabilities. The petitioner claims for implementation of the benefit of the Disabilities Act, 2016 and also relying on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajeev Kumar Gupta and others -Vs-The Union of India and Others reported in (2016) 13 SCC 153. The petitioners have submitted a representation before the respondent authorities praying for consideration of th
Rajeev Kumar Gupta and others -Vs-The Union of India and Others reported in (2016) 13 SCC 153
Persons with disabilities are entitled to promotion under the Disabilities Act, 2016, and must be considered for such promotions as per the law.
Persons with benchmark disabilities entitled to 4% reservation in promotion to identified posts irrespective of mode, notionally from 30.06.2016 subject to eligibility via review committee; supernume....
Employees acquiring disability during service are entitled to promotion benefits under the PH quota, irrespective of the timing of their disability acquisition as confirmed by the RPWD Act.
Reservation in promotion for Persons with Disabilities requires identification of suitable posts; without such identification, no legal right to promotion exists.
Only in those cases that the Government is of the view that the posts in the promotional cadres cannot be reserved for the PwD category due to functional or other reasons, the same cannot be used as ....
(1) Total number of vacancies in cadre strength would include vacancies to be filled in by nomination as well as by promotion.(2) Absence of rules to provide for reservation in promotion would not de....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.